Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs HWAZX
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWAZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$41.01
Change-$0.33 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.89B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$41.38
Change-$0.41 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets786.73M
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWAZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Buy and HWAZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. HWAZX (787M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPSX (1.93) vs HWAZX (1.13). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPSX (36 years) vs HWAZX (6 years). HWAZX (0.88) and FLPSX (0.87) have similar cost to investors . HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPSX (22.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPSX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.35 vs. FLPSX (-5.85). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 62.36 vs. FLPSX (-5.08).
| FLPSX | HWAZX | FLPSX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.88 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.88 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.605 | 11.798 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.9B | 787M | 2,910% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.13 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.85 | -0.35 | 1,655% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.52 | 25.51 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.08 | 62.36 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers