Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs HWAZX
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWAZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$44.84
Change+$0.10 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.15B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$41.01
Change+$0.24 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets743.15M
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWAZX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Buy and HWAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. HWAZX (743M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPSX (1.74) vs HWAZX (1.17). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPSX (36 years) vs HWAZX (6 years). FLPSX (0.89) and HWAZX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPSX (23.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPSX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.33 vs. FLPSX (-4.88). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 88.13 vs. FLPSX (9.18).
| FLPSX | HWAZX | FLPSX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.037 | 9.711 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 743M | 3,109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.17 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.88 | 5.33 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.88 | 36.38 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.18 | 88.13 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement