Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs HWAZX
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWAZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$41.07
Change+$0.07 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.67B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$41.98
Change+$0.13 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets777.87M
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWAZX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Hold and HWAZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. HWAZX (778M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPSX (1.89) vs HWAZX (1.11). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPSX (36 years) vs HWAZX (6 years). HWAZX (0.88) and FLPSX (0.87) have similar cost to investors . HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPSX (22.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPSX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.49 vs. FLPSX (-6.16). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 79.85 vs. FLPSX (-0.22).
| FLPSX | HWAZX | FLPSX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.88 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.88 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.058 | 12.306 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 778M | 3,046% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.11 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.16 | 2.49 | -247% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.51 | 39.24 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.22 | 79.85 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement