Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs HWAZX
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWAZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$43.49
Change+$2.19 (+5.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.76B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$41.87
Change-$0.61 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets832.34M
FLPSX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWAZX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Buy and HWAZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. HWAZX (832M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPSX (2.13) vs HWAZX (1.19). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPSX (36 years) vs HWAZX (6 years). HWAZX (0.88) and FLPSX (0.87) have similar cost to investors . HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FLPSX (22.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPSX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.78 vs. FLPSX (6.90). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 34.81 vs. FLPSX (-7.62).
| FLPSX | HWAZX | FLPSX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.88 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.88 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.948 | 1.429 | 346% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8B | 832M | 2,861% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.19 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.90 | 8.78 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.02 | 21.92 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.62 | 34.81 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement