Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs HWACX
FLPSX vs HWACX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWACX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$41.34
Change+$0.12 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.89B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C
Price$36.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets783.66M
FLPSX vs HWACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Buy and HWACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. HWACX (784M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWACX: FLPSX (1.93) vs HWACX (0.32). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWACX: FLPSX (36 years) vs HWACX (22 years). HWACX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FLPSX (0.87). HWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPSX (22.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWACX: FLPSX (0) vs HWACX (2500). HWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.41 vs. FLPSX (-5.85). HWACX return over 5 years is better than : 49.61 vs. FLPSX (-5.08).
| FLPSX | HWACX | FLPSX / HWACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.93 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.93 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.605 | 10.758 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.9B | 784M | 2,921% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 0.32 | 594% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.85 | -2.41 | 243% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.52 | 19.39 | -39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.08 | 49.61 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.19 | 50.60 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers