Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs HWACX
FLPSX vs HWACX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs HWACX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$46.04
Change+$0.13 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.02B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C
Price$37.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets769.27M
FLPSX vs HWACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. HWACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Buy and HWACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. HWACX (769M). FLPSX pays higher dividends than HWACX: FLPSX (1.66) vs HWACX (0.32). FLPSX was incepted earlier than HWACX: FLPSX (36 years) vs HWACX (22 years). HWACX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FLPSX (0.89). HWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPSX (23.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWACX: FLPSX (0) vs HWACX (2500). HWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.34 vs. FLPSX (-2.36). HWACX return over 5 years is better than : 68.67 vs. FLPSX (7.19).
| FLPSX | HWACX | FLPSX / HWACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.90 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.90 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.982 | 12.303 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 769M | 3,121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 0.32 | 518% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.36 | 4.34 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.62 | 30.70 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.19 | 68.67 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.41 | 52.65 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement