Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPKX vs NMVZX
FLPKX vs NMVZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPKX vs NMVZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K
Price$41.62
Change+$0.33 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.02B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Z
Price$12.21
Change+$0.10 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets433.11M
FLPKX vs NMVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPKX vs. NMVZX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPKX is a Buy and NMVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPKX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. NMVZX (433M). NMVZX pays higher dividends than FLPKX: NMVZX (2.71) vs FLPKX (1.72). FLPKX was incepted earlier than NMVZX: FLPKX (17 years) vs NMVZX (8 years). NMVZX (0.84) and FLPKX (0.82) have similar cost to investors . NMVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FLPKX (23.00). FLPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMVZX: FLPKX (0) vs NMVZX (2500). FLPKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.11 vs. NMVZX (-8.51). NMVZX return over 5 years is better than : 9.58 vs. FLPKX (7.90).
| FLPKX | NMVZX | FLPKX / NMVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.79 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.84 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.781 | 0.792 | 478% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 433M | 5,543% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 2.71 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.11 | -8.51 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.23 | 10.69 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.90 | 9.58 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers