Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPKX vs HWAZX
FLPKX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPKX vs HWAZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K
Price$44.77
Change+$0.09 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.15B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$41.01
Change+$0.24 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets743.15M
FLPKX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPKX vs. HWAZX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPKX is a Buy and HWAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPKX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. HWAZX (743M). FLPKX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPKX (1.80) vs HWAZX (1.17). FLPKX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPKX (17 years) vs HWAZX (6 years). HWAZX (0.86) and FLPKX (0.82) have similar cost to investors . HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPKX (23.00). FLPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPKX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.33 vs. FLPKX (-4.85). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 88.13 vs. FLPKX (9.51).
| FLPKX | HWAZX | FLPKX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.86 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.86 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.054 | 9.711 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 743M | 3,109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.17 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.85 | 5.33 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.72 | 36.38 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.51 | 88.13 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers