Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPKX vs HWAZX
FLPKX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPKX vs HWAZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K
Price$41.55
Change-$0.07 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.04B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$41.77
Change+$0.06 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets779.58M
FLPKX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPKX vs. HWAZX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPKX is a StrongBuy and HWAZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPKX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. HWAZX (780M). FLPKX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPKX (1.92) vs HWAZX (1.13). FLPKX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPKX (18 years) vs HWAZX (6 years). HWAZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FLPKX (0.79). HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPKX (22.00). FLPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPKX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.88 vs. FLPKX (-5.63). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 48.98 vs. FLPKX (-8.26).
| FLPKX | HWAZX | FLPKX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.88 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.88 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.781 | 11.584 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23B | 780M | 2,949% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.13 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.63 | -1.88 | 298% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.59 | 24.50 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.26 | 48.98 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers