Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPKX vs HWACX
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison
Open Charts FLPKX vs HWACX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K
Price$44.62
Change+$0.21 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.15B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C
Price$35.86
Change+$0.15 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets740.25M
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPKX vs. HWACX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPKX is a Buy and HWACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPKX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. HWACX (740M). FLPKX pays higher dividends than HWACX: FLPKX (1.80) vs HWACX (0.34). FLPKX was incepted earlier than HWACX: FLPKX (17 years) vs HWACX (22 years). HWACX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FLPKX (0.82). HWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPKX (23.00). FLPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWACX: FLPKX (0) vs HWACX (2500). HWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.36 vs. FLPKX (-2.86). HWACX return over 5 years is better than : 76.98 vs. FLPKX (13.03).
| FLPKX | HWACX | FLPKX / HWACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.90 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.90 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.685 | 8.667 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 740M | 3,122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.34 | 535% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.86 | 4.36 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.49 | 35.56 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.03 | 76.98 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.81 | 38.38 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement