Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPKX vs HWACX
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison
Open Charts FLPKX vs HWACX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K
Price$45.98
Change+$0.13 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.02B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C
Price$37.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets769.27M
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPKX vs. HWACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPKX is a Buy and HWACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPKX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. HWACX (769M). FLPKX pays higher dividends than HWACX: FLPKX (1.72) vs HWACX (0.32). FLPKX was incepted earlier than HWACX: FLPKX (17 years) vs HWACX (22 years). HWACX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FLPKX (0.82). HWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPKX (23.00). FLPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWACX: FLPKX (0) vs HWACX (2500). HWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.34 vs. FLPKX (-2.30). HWACX return over 5 years is better than : 68.67 vs. FLPKX (7.55).
| FLPKX | HWACX | FLPKX / HWACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.90 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.90 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.029 | 12.303 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 769M | 3,121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 0.32 | 535% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.30 | 4.34 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.81 | 30.70 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.55 | 68.67 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.09 | 52.65 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers