Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPKX vs HWACX
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison
Open Charts FLPKX vs HWACX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K
Price$41.01
Change+$0.07 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.67B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C
Price$36.75
Change+$0.11 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets777.87M
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPKX vs. HWACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPKX is a Hold and HWACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPKX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. HWACX (778M). FLPKX pays higher dividends than HWACX: FLPKX (1.92) vs HWACX (0.32). FLPKX was incepted earlier than HWACX: FLPKX (17 years) vs HWACX (22 years). HWACX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FLPKX (0.79). HWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FLPKX (22.00). FLPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWACX: FLPKX (0) vs HWACX (2500). HWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.39 vs. FLPKX (-6.10). HWACX return over 5 years is better than : 65.72 vs. FLPKX (0.09).
| FLPKX | HWACX | FLPKX / HWACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.93 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.93 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.086 | 11.364 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 778M | 3,046% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.32 | 605% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.10 | 0.39 | -1,546% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.33 | 32.49 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.09 | 65.72 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.74 | 48.98 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement