FLO
Price
$15.97
Change
-$0.06 (-0.37%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5B
40 days until earnings call
UTZ
Price
$12.45
Change
-$0.30 (-2.35%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.5B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLO vs UTZ

Header iconFLO vs UTZ Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs UTZBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$15.97
Change-$0.06 (-0.37%)
Volume$3.82M
Capitalization5B
Utz Brands
Price$12.45
Change-$0.30 (-2.35%)
Volume$3.66M
Capitalization1.5B
FLO vs UTZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. UTZ commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Buy and UTZ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FLO: $15.97 vs. UTZ: $12.45)
Brand notoriety: FLO and UTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 143% vs. UTZ: 306%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $5B vs. UTZ: $1.5B
FLO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5B. UTZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the long-term than UTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than UTZ.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.63% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -6.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

UTZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLO($5B) has a higher market cap than UTZ($1.5B). UTZ has higher P/E ratio than FLO: UTZ (81.45) vs FLO (40.74). UTZ (-19.714) and FLO (-20.522) have similar YTD gains . FLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 345M vs. UTZ (99.2M). UTZ has more cash in the bank: 52M vs. FLO (22.5M). UTZ has less debt than FLO: UTZ (985M) vs FLO (1.35B). FLO has higher revenues than UTZ: FLO (5.09B) vs UTZ (1.44B).
FLOUTZFLO / UTZ
Capitalization5B1.5B333%
EBITDA345M99.2M348%
Gain YTD-20.522-19.714104%
P/E Ratio40.7481.4550%
Revenue5.09B1.44B354%
Total Cash22.5M52M43%
Total Debt1.35B985M137%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs UTZ: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
UTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10085
SMR RATING
1..100
5285
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8179
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (9) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (48) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as FLO (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (85) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as FLO (81) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (100) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOUTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASPCX24.830.13
+0.53%
Alger Spectra C
IRGFX22.970.07
+0.31%
Macquarie Small Cap Growth R6
AADBX15.040.04
+0.27%
American Beacon Balanced R5
STSIX15.270.04
+0.26%
American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr R5
AMECX26.540.05
+0.19%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer A

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-0.37%
GIS - FLO
71%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
KHC - FLO
70%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
CPB - FLO
68%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
CAG - FLO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
HRL - FLO
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
More

UTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UTZ
1D Price
Change %
UTZ100%
-2.35%
KHC - UTZ
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
FLO - UTZ
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
CAG - UTZ
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
CPB - UTZ
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
GIS - UTZ
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
More