FLO
Price
$11.76
Change
+$0.55 (+4.91%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.37B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UTZ
Price
$10.47
Change
+$0.31 (+3.05%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
889.1M
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLO vs UTZ

Header iconFLO vs UTZ Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs UTZBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$11.76
Change+$0.55 (+4.91%)
Volume$603
Capitalization2.37B
Utz Brands
Price$10.47
Change+$0.31 (+3.05%)
Volume$628
Capitalization889.1M
FLO vs UTZ Comparison Chart in %
FLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. UTZ commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a StrongBuy and UTZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FLO: $11.21 vs. UTZ: $10.16)
Brand notoriety: FLO and UTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 86% vs. UTZ: 154%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $2.37B vs. UTZ: $889.1M
FLO [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $2.37B. UTZ’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $889.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $251.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UTZ is a better buy in the long-term than FLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than UTZ.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.72% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -3.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +239.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

UTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.57% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLO($2.37B) has a higher market cap than UTZ($889M). UTZ has higher P/E ratio than FLO: UTZ (169.33) vs FLO (12.32). FLO YTD gains are higher at: 3.033 vs. UTZ (-2.119). FLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 489M vs. UTZ (139M). FLO has more cash in the bank: 16.7M vs. UTZ (314K). UTZ has less debt than FLO: UTZ (1.03B) vs FLO (2.13B). FLO has higher revenues than UTZ: FLO (5.14B) vs UTZ (1.44B).
FLOUTZFLO / UTZ
Capitalization2.37B889M266%
EBITDA489M139M352%
Gain YTD3.033-2.119-143%
P/E Ratio12.32169.337%
Revenue5.14B1.44B357%
Total Cash16.7M314K5,318%
Total Debt2.13B1.03B206%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs UTZ: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
UTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6276
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5789
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
797
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (2) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (50) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (100) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (57) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (89) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as FLO (64) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (79) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOUTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YAFFX21.300.30
+1.43%
AMG Yacktman Focused N
IGICX47.820.18
+0.38%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc C
BRUNX16.660.04
+0.24%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R6
SGFCX45.94-0.75
-1.61%
Sparrow Growth C
RMQCX427.76-13.77
-3.12%
Rydex Monthly Rbl NASDAQ-100® 2x Strt C

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-0.36%
GIS - FLO
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
CAG - FLO
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.97%
CPB - FLO
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.29%
KHC - FLO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
MKC - FLO
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
More

UTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UTZ
1D Price
Change %
UTZ100%
-4.78%
KHC - UTZ
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
FLO - UTZ
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
CPB - UTZ
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.29%
GIS - UTZ
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
MKC - UTZ
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
More