FLO
Price
$16.10
Change
-$0.26 (-1.59%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5B
31 days until earnings call
TR
Price
$35.47
Change
+$0.19 (+0.54%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.23B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLO vs TR

Header iconFLO vs TR Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs TRBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$16.10
Change-$0.26 (-1.59%)
Volume$1.68M
Capitalization5B
Tootsie Roll Industries
Price$35.47
Change+$0.19 (+0.54%)
Volume$130.95K
Capitalization2.23B
FLO vs TR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. TR commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Buy and TR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FLO: $16.10 vs. TR: $35.47)
Brand notoriety: FLO and TR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 60% vs. TR: 57%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $5B vs. TR: $2.23B
FLO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5B. TR’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TR is a better buy in the long-term than FLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • TR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than TR.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.44% price change this week, while TR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +5.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

TR is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.74% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLO($5B) has a higher market cap than TR($2.23B). FLO has higher P/E ratio than TR: FLO (40.74) vs TR (24.04). TR YTD gains are higher at: 13.635 vs. FLO (-19.875). FLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 345M vs. TR (138M). TR has more cash in the bank: 171M vs. FLO (22.5M). TR has less debt than FLO: TR (15.9M) vs FLO (1.35B). FLO has higher revenues than TR: FLO (5.09B) vs TR (769M).
FLOTRFLO / TR
Capitalization5B2.23B224%
EBITDA345M138M250%
Gain YTD-19.87513.635-146%
P/E Ratio40.7424.04169%
Revenue5.09B769M662%
Total Cash22.5M171M13%
Total Debt1.35B15.9M8,497%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs TR: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
TR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
5266
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8149
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9725
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (7) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TR (62). This means that FLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than TR’s over the last 12 months.

TR's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (100). This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as TR (66). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to TR’s over the last 12 months.

TR's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (81). This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TR's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (97). This means that TR’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOTR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LVOOX20.210.15
+0.75%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities F3
CCGIX25.940.11
+0.43%
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
RERBX57.180.12
+0.21%
American Funds EUPAC R2
IHOVX22.870.04
+0.18%
Hartford International Opportunities R6
HJIRX15.87-0.02
-0.13%
Hardman Johnston Intl Gr Fd Retl Shr

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-1.59%
GIS - FLO
71%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
KHC - FLO
70%
Closely correlated
-1.48%
CPB - FLO
68%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
CAG - FLO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
HRL - FLO
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
More

TR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TR has been loosely correlated with MDLZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TR jumps, then MDLZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TR
1D Price
Change %
TR100%
+0.54%
MDLZ - TR
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
KHC - TR
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
FLO - TR
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
SMPL - TR
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
HRL - TR
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
More