FLO
Price
$15.97
Change
-$0.06 (-0.37%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5B
40 days until earnings call
SENEA
Price
$100.60
Change
+$1.14 (+1.15%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
404.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLO vs SENEA

Header iconFLO vs SENEA Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs SENEABanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$15.97
Change-$0.06 (-0.37%)
Volume$3.82M
Capitalization5B
Seneca Foods
Price$100.60
Change+$1.14 (+1.15%)
Volume$112.41K
Capitalization404.39M
FLO vs SENEA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SENEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. SENEA commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Buy and SENEA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FLO: $15.97 vs. SENEA: $100.60)
Brand notoriety: FLO and SENEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 143% vs. SENEA: 185%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $5B vs. SENEA: $404.39M
FLO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5B. SENEA’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $404.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSENEA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SENEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SENEA is a better buy in the long-term than FLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SENEA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SENEA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SENEA is a better buy in the short-term than FLO.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.63% price change this week, while SENEA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +11.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLO($5B) has a higher market cap than SENEA($404M). FLO has higher P/E ratio than SENEA: FLO (40.74) vs SENEA (7.41). SENEA YTD gains are higher at: 26.924 vs. FLO (-20.522). FLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 345M vs. SENEA (145M). FLO has more cash in the bank: 22.5M vs. SENEA (7.17M). SENEA has less debt than FLO: SENEA (669M) vs FLO (1.35B). FLO has higher revenues than SENEA: FLO (5.09B) vs SENEA (1.48B).
FLOSENEAFLO / SENEA
Capitalization5B404M1,238%
EBITDA345M145M238%
Gain YTD-20.52226.924-76%
P/E Ratio40.747.41550%
Revenue5.09B1.48B344%
Total Cash22.5M7.17M314%
Total Debt1.35B669M202%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs SENEA: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
SENEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
732
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10020
SMR RATING
1..100
5280
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
986
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (9) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for SENEA (76). This means that FLO’s stock grew significantly faster than SENEA’s over the last 12 months.

SENEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (100). This means that SENEA’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SENEA (80). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to SENEA’s over the last 12 months.

SENEA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLO (81). This means that SENEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

SENEA's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (98). This means that SENEA’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOSENEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SENEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASPCX24.830.13
+0.53%
Alger Spectra C
IRGFX22.970.07
+0.31%
Macquarie Small Cap Growth R6
AADBX15.040.04
+0.27%
American Beacon Balanced R5
STSIX15.270.04
+0.26%
American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr R5
AMECX26.540.05
+0.19%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer A

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-0.37%
GIS - FLO
71%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
KHC - FLO
70%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
CPB - FLO
68%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
CAG - FLO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
HRL - FLO
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
More

SENEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SENEA has been loosely correlated with UTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SENEA jumps, then UTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SENEA
1D Price
Change %
SENEA100%
+1.15%
UTZ - SENEA
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.35%
FLO - SENEA
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
KHC - SENEA
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
JBSS - SENEA
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
THS - SENEA
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
More