FLO
Price
$23.25
Change
+$0.16 (+0.69%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
40 days until earnings call
POST
Price
$116.10
Change
+$0.43 (+0.37%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
47 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLO vs POST

Header iconFLO vs POST Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs POSTBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$23.25
Change+$0.16 (+0.69%)
Volume$728.75K
CapitalizationN/A
Post Holdings
Price$116.10
Change+$0.43 (+0.37%)
Volume$414.71K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FLO vs POST Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
POST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FLO vs. POST commentary
Sep 29, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Hold and POST is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2024
Stock price -- (FLO: $23.15 vs. POST: $116.92)
Brand notoriety: FLO and POST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 95% vs. POST: 68%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $5B vs. POST: $6.45B
FLO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5B. POST’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $6.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $8.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePOST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • POST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, POST is a better buy in the long-term than FLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • POST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than POST.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +1.58% price change this week, while POST (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.

POST is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.61% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
POST($6.45B) has a higher market cap than FLO($5B). FLO has higher P/E ratio than POST: FLO (40.74) vs POST (22.68). POST YTD gains are higher at: 32.773 vs. FLO (4.982). POST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.13B vs. FLO (345M). POST has more cash in the bank: 151M vs. FLO (22.5M). FLO has less debt than POST: FLO (1.35B) vs POST (6.32B). POST has higher revenues than FLO: POST (7.39B) vs FLO (5.09B).
FLOPOSTFLO / POST
Capitalization5B6.45B78%
EBITDA345M1.13B31%
Gain YTD4.98232.77315%
P/E Ratio40.7422.68180%
Revenue5.09B7.39B69%
Total Cash22.5M151M15%
Total Debt1.35B6.32B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs POST: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
POST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2220
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6317
SMR RATING
1..100
7579
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1635
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (17) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for POST (85). This means that FLO’s stock grew significantly faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.

POST's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLO (63). This means that POST’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (75) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as POST (79). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to POST’s over the last 12 months.

POST's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (56). This means that POST’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as POST (35). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to POST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOPOST
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
POST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-0.39%
GIS - FLO
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
CAG - FLO
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
MDLZ - FLO
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
CPB - FLO
56%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
KHC - FLO
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
More

POST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POST has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if POST jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POST
1D Price
Change %
POST100%
+0.99%
KHC - POST
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
FLO - POST
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
GIS - POST
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
HSY - POST
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
CAG - POST
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
More