FLO
Price
$10.90
Change
+$0.44 (+4.21%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.3B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
POST
Price
$98.28
Change
+$0.71 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
5.07B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLO vs POST

Header iconFLO vs POST Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs POSTBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$10.90
Change+$0.44 (+4.21%)
Volume$4.41M
Capitalization2.3B
Post Holdings
Price$98.28
Change+$0.71 (+0.73%)
Volume$910.27K
Capitalization5.07B
FLO vs POST Comparison Chart in %
FLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
POST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. POST commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Hold and POST is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (FLO: $10.90 vs. POST: $98.28)
Brand notoriety: FLO and POST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 103% vs. POST: 107%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $2.3B vs. POST: $5.07B
FLO [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $2.3B. POST’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $5.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $245.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • POST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FLO and POST are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • POST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than POST.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +8.13% price change this week, while POST (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +113.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

POST is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.47% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
POST($5.07B) has a higher market cap than FLO($2.3B). POST has higher P/E ratio than FLO: POST (17.84) vs FLO (11.98). FLO YTD gains are higher at: 0.184 vs. POST (-0.777). POST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.33B vs. FLO (489M). POST has more cash in the bank: 177M vs. FLO (16.7M). FLO has less debt than POST: FLO (2.13B) vs POST (7.7B). POST has higher revenues than FLO: POST (8.16B) vs FLO (5.14B).
FLOPOSTFLO / POST
Capitalization2.3B5.07B45%
EBITDA489M1.33B37%
Gain YTD0.184-0.777-24%
P/E Ratio11.9817.8467%
Revenue5.14B8.16B63%
Total Cash16.7M177M9%
Total Debt2.13B7.7B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs POST: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
POST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6771
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
5776
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8274
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8561
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (2) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for POST (86). This means that FLO’s stock grew significantly faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.

POST's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLO (100). This means that POST’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (57) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as POST (76). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to POST’s over the last 12 months.

POST's Price Growth Rating (74) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (82). This means that POST’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

POST's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (85). This means that POST’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOPOST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
POST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCSCX22.160.14
+0.64%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value C
RGISX10.000.06
+0.60%
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure S
ACROX18.95-0.03
-0.16%
ACR Opportunity Fund I Shares
RNWHX95.66-0.26
-0.27%
American Funds New World R5E
WTRCX11.08-0.06
-0.54%
Nomura Core Equity Fund Class C

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been closely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
+4.21%
CAG - FLO
67%
Closely correlated
+3.32%
GIS - FLO
66%
Closely correlated
+3.05%
CPB - FLO
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
KHC - FLO
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.45%
MKC - FLO
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
More

POST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POST has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if POST jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POST
1D Price
Change %
POST100%
+0.73%
GIS - POST
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
KHC - POST
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.45%
MKC - POST
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
MDLZ - POST
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
FLO - POST
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.21%
More