FLO
Price
$11.76
Change
+$0.55 (+4.91%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.37B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LW
Price
$47.20
Change
+$0.90 (+1.94%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.43B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLO vs LW

Header iconFLO vs LW Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs LWBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$11.76
Change+$0.55 (+4.91%)
Volume$603
Capitalization2.37B
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$47.20
Change+$0.90 (+1.94%)
Volume$3.17K
Capitalization6.43B
FLO vs LW Comparison Chart in %
FLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. LW commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a StrongBuy and LW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FLO: $11.21 vs. LW: $46.29)
Brand notoriety: FLO and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 86% vs. LW: 96%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $2.37B vs. LW: $6.43B
FLO [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $2.37B. LW’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $6.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $251.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than FLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than LW.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.72% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +3.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +239.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

LW is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.57% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($6.43B) has a higher market cap than FLO($2.37B). LW has higher P/E ratio than FLO: LW (16.77) vs FLO (12.32). LW YTD gains are higher at: 11.425 vs. FLO (3.033). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. FLO (489M). FLO has less debt than LW: FLO (2.13B) vs LW (3.95B). LW has higher revenues than FLO: LW (6.47B) vs FLO (5.14B).
FLOLWFLO / LW
Capitalization2.37B6.43B37%
EBITDA489M1.12B44%
Gain YTD3.03311.42527%
P/E Ratio12.3216.7773%
Revenue5.14B6.47B79%
Total Cash16.7MN/A-
Total Debt2.13B3.95B54%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6218
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5740
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6463
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7980
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (2) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (26). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (100). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (40) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (57). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (64). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (80). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YAFFX21.300.30
+1.43%
AMG Yacktman Focused N
IGICX47.820.18
+0.38%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc C
BRUNX16.660.04
+0.24%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R6
SGFCX45.94-0.75
-1.61%
Sparrow Growth C
RMQCX427.76-13.77
-3.12%
Rydex Monthly Rbl NASDAQ-100® 2x Strt C

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-0.36%
GIS - FLO
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
CAG - FLO
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.97%
CPB - FLO
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.29%
KHC - FLO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
MKC - FLO
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+2.82%
CAG - LW
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.97%
FLO - LW
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
KHC - LW
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
CPB - LW
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.29%
GIS - LW
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
More