FLO
Price
$16.71
Change
+$0.25 (+1.52%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
5B
61 days until earnings call
LANC
Price
$167.93
Change
+$0.84 (+0.50%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.67B
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLO vs LANC

Header iconFLO vs LANC Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs LANCBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$16.71
Change+$0.25 (+1.52%)
Volume$2.2M
Capitalization5B
Lancaster Colony
Price$167.93
Change+$0.84 (+0.50%)
Volume$109.61K
Capitalization5.67B
FLO vs LANC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. LANC commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a StrongBuy and LANC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FLO: $17.02 vs. LANC: $164.68)
Brand notoriety: FLO and LANC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 128% vs. LANC: 90%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $5B vs. LANC: $5.67B
FLO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5B. LANC’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $5.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLANC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LANC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the long-term than LANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LANC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LANC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than LANC.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +3.15% price change this week, while LANC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

LANC is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.46% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LANC($5.67B) has a higher market cap than FLO($5B). LANC has higher P/E ratio than FLO: LANC (43.94) vs FLO (40.74). LANC YTD gains are higher at: -4.413 vs. FLO (-16.557). FLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 345M vs. LANC (244M). LANC has more cash in the bank: 134M vs. FLO (22.5M). LANC has less debt than FLO: LANC (13.3M) vs FLO (1.35B). FLO has higher revenues than LANC: FLO (5.09B) vs LANC (1.87B).
FLOLANCFLO / LANC
Capitalization5B5.67B88%
EBITDA345M244M141%
Gain YTD-16.557-4.413375%
P/E Ratio40.7443.9493%
Revenue5.09B1.87B273%
Total Cash22.5M134M17%
Total Debt1.35B13.3M10,158%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs LANC: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
LANC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10057
SMR RATING
1..100
4952
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7978
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9784
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (9) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LANC (60). This means that FLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than LANC’s over the last 12 months.

LANC's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLO (100). This means that LANC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (49) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LANC (52). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

LANC's Price Growth Rating (78) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (79). This means that LANC’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

LANC's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (97). This means that LANC’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOLANC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
45%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
+0.06%
GIS - FLO
72%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
KHC - FLO
70%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
CPB - FLO
69%
Closely correlated
-1.60%
CAG - FLO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
SJM - FLO
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
More

LANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LANC has been loosely correlated with JBSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LANC jumps, then JBSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LANC
1D Price
Change %
LANC100%
-2.02%
JBSS - LANC
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
FLO - LANC
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
MDLZ - LANC
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
JJSF - LANC
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
CENTA - LANC
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
More