FLO
Price
$19.40
Change
+$0.16 (+0.83%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5B
19 days until earnings call
INGR
Price
$135.15
Change
+$0.82 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.69B
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLO vs INGR

Header iconFLO vs INGR Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs INGRBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$19.40
Change+$0.16 (+0.83%)
Volume$14.63K
Capitalization5B
Ingredion
Price$135.15
Change+$0.82 (+0.61%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization7.69B
FLO vs INGR Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. INGR commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Hold and INGR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FLO: $19.24 vs. INGR: $134.33)
Brand notoriety: FLO and INGR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 169% vs. INGR: 114%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $5B vs. INGR: $7.69B
FLO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5B. INGR’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $7.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINGR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • INGR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, INGR is a better buy in the long-term than FLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INGR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • INGR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than INGR.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -3.51% price change this week, while INGR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

INGR is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.26% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INGR($7.69B) has a higher market cap than FLO($5B). FLO has higher P/E ratio than INGR: FLO (40.74) vs INGR (12.21). INGR YTD gains are higher at: -1.777 vs. FLO (-6.873). INGR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.17B vs. FLO (345M). INGR has more cash in the bank: 409M vs. FLO (22.5M). FLO has less debt than INGR: FLO (1.35B) vs INGR (2.4B). INGR has higher revenues than FLO: INGR (8.16B) vs FLO (5.09B).
FLOINGRFLO / INGR
Capitalization5B7.69B65%
EBITDA345M1.17B29%
Gain YTD-6.873-1.777387%
P/E Ratio40.7412.21334%
Revenue5.09B8.16B62%
Total Cash22.5M409M6%
Total Debt1.35B2.4B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs INGR: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
INGR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
554
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8617
SMR RATING
1..100
5250
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9638
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (13) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as INGR (39) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to INGR’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (86) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's SMR Rating (50) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as FLO (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as FLO (79) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLO (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOINGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY591.64-1.14
-0.19%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X99756.910000-747.585940
-0.74%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.72-0.24
-0.86%
GameStop Corp
TSLA413.82-14.40
-3.36%
Tesla
AAPL228.26-9.61
-4.04%
Apple

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
+0.42%
GIS - FLO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
CPB - FLO
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
CAG - FLO
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
MDLZ - FLO
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
SJM - FLO
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.01%
More

INGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INGR has been loosely correlated with SMPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INGR jumps, then SMPL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INGR
1D Price
Change %
INGR100%
+1.13%
SMPL - INGR
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
K - INGR
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
FLO - INGR
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
MDLZ - INGR
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
DAR - INGR
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More