It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHRL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -2.03% price change this week, while HRL (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -2.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.25%.
FLO is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.
HRL is expected to report earnings on May 29, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
FLO | HRL | FLO / HRL | |
Capitalization | 5B | 19.1B | 26% |
EBITDA | 345M | 1.35B | 26% |
Gain YTD | -11.181 | -8.939 | 125% |
P/E Ratio | 40.74 | 24.12 | 169% |
Revenue | 5.09B | 12.1B | 42% |
Total Cash | 22.5M | 982M | 2% |
Total Debt | 1.35B | 3.31B | 41% |
FLO | HRL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLO's Valuation (12) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as HRL (20) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to HRL’s over the last 12 months.
FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as HRL (100) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to HRL’s over the last 12 months.
FLO's SMR Rating (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as HRL (69) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to HRL’s over the last 12 months.
HRL's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry is in the same range as FLO (79) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that HRL’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.
HRL's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Food Meat Or Fish Or Dairy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLO (97) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that HRL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.
FLO | HRL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago63% | 5 days ago53% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago63% | 5 days ago52% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago46% | 5 days ago48% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago40% | 5 days ago50% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago47% | 5 days ago45% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago43% | 5 days ago41% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago49% | 27 days ago42% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago47% | 5 days ago47% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago62% | 5 days ago51% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago38% | 5 days ago33% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRL has been loosely correlated with CPB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRL jumps, then CPB could also see price increases.