FLNG
Price
$25.55
Change
-$0.47 (-1.81%)
Updated
Sep 9, 12:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.37B
80 days until earnings call
MPIR
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
19.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLNG vs MPIR

Header iconFLNG vs MPIR Comparison
Open Charts FLNG vs MPIRBanner chart's image
FLEX LNG
Price$25.55
Change-$0.47 (-1.81%)
Volume$600
Capitalization1.37B
Empire Diversified Energy
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.9K
Capitalization19.83M
FLNG vs MPIR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPIR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLNG vs. MPIR commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLNG is a Hold and MPIR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FLNG: $26.02 vs. MPIR: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: FLNG and MPIR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLNG: 107% vs. MPIR: 54%
Market capitalization -- FLNG: $1.37B vs. MPIR: $19.83M
FLNG [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $1.37B. MPIR’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $19.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $105.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $11.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLNG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMPIR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLNG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MPIR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLNG is a better buy in the long-term than MPIR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLNG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPIR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLNG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MPIR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MPIR is a better buy in the short-term than FLNG.

Price Growth

FLNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -1.80% price change this week, while MPIR (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +111.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLNG is expected to report earnings on Nov 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.47% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLNG($1.37B) has a higher market cap than MPIR($19.8M). FLNG YTD gains are higher at: 24.071 vs. MPIR (-38.525). FLNG has more cash in the bank: 413M vs. MPIR (288K). MPIR has less debt than FLNG: MPIR (102M) vs FLNG (1.8B).
FLNGMPIRFLNG / MPIR
Capitalization1.37B19.8M6,919%
EBITDA273MN/A-
Gain YTD24.071-38.525-62%
P/E Ratio14.22N/A-
Revenue356MN/A-
Total Cash413M288K143,403%
Total Debt1.8B102M1,767%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLNG vs MPIR: Fundamental Ratings
FLNG
MPIR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8190
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
62100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4793
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPIR's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as FLNG (4). This means that MPIR’s stock grew similarly to FLNG’s over the last 12 months.

FLNG's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MPIR (100). This means that FLNG’s stock grew significantly faster than MPIR’s over the last 12 months.

FLNG's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPIR (100). This means that FLNG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPIR’s over the last 12 months.

FLNG's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPIR (93). This means that FLNG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPIR’s over the last 12 months.

FLNG's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MPIR (100). This means that FLNG’s stock grew significantly faster than MPIR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLNGMPIR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPIR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPZEF18.060.13
+0.71%
TOPAZ ENERGY CORP.
BRSYF5.49N/A
N/A
Brainsway Ltd.
IAUGF5.55N/A
N/A
Insurance Australia Group Ltd.
PTEEF0.05N/A
N/A
Plaintree Systems Inc.
PGZFF0.09N/A
-0.53%
Pan Global Resource, Inc.

FLNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLNG has been loosely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLNG jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLNG
1D Price
Change %
FLNG100%
+0.85%
FRO - FLNG
56%
Loosely correlated
+3.48%
DHT - FLNG
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
TRMD - FLNG
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
CLCO - FLNG
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
TEN - FLNG
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.11%
More

MPIR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MPIR and ATGFF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPIR and ATGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPIR
1D Price
Change %
MPIR100%
N/A
ATGFF - MPIR
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
ET - MPIR
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
INSW - MPIR
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
FLNG - MPIR
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
TRMD - MPIR
-2%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
More