FLNG
Price
$25.14
Change
+$0.46 (+1.86%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.33B
24 days until earnings call
MARPS
Price
$4.51
Change
-$0.09 (-1.96%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
9.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLNG vs MARPS

Header iconFLNG vs MARPS Comparison
Open Charts FLNG vs MARPSBanner chart's image
FLEX LNG
Price$25.14
Change+$0.46 (+1.86%)
Volume$418.75K
Capitalization1.33B
Marine Petroleum Trust
Price$4.51
Change-$0.09 (-1.96%)
Volume$1.24K
Capitalization9.02M
FLNG vs MARPS Comparison Chart in %
FLNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MARPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLNG vs. MARPS commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLNG is a Hold and MARPS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FLNG: $25.14 vs. MARPS: $4.51)
Brand notoriety: FLNG and MARPS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLNG: 92% vs. MARPS: 22%
Market capitalization -- FLNG: $1.33B vs. MARPS: $9.02M
FLNG [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $1.33B. MARPS’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $9.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $102.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $11.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLNG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMARPS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FLNG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MARPS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MARPS is a better buy in the long-term than FLNG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLNG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MARPS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLNG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MARPS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MARPS is a better buy in the short-term than FLNG.

Price Growth

FLNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +2.91% price change this week, while MARPS (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -7.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLNG is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.62% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLNG($1.33B) has a higher market cap than MARPS($9.02M). FLNG has higher P/E ratio than MARPS: FLNG (13.74) vs MARPS (12.53). MARPS (20.891) and FLNG (19.875) have similar YTD gains . FLNG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 273M vs. MARPS (689K). FLNG has higher revenues than MARPS: FLNG (356M) vs MARPS (998K).
FLNGMARPSFLNG / MARPS
Capitalization1.33B9.02M14,734%
EBITDA273M689K39,623%
Gain YTD19.87520.89195%
P/E Ratio13.7412.53110%
Revenue356M998K35,671%
Total Cash413MN/A-
Total Debt1.8BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLNG vs MARPS: Fundamental Ratings
FLNG
MARPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6434
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1470
SMR RATING
1..100
6115
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2433
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLNG's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MARPS (14). This means that FLNG’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

FLNG's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MARPS (70). This means that FLNG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

MARPS's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLNG (61). This means that MARPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLNG’s over the last 12 months.

FLNG's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MARPS (53). This means that FLNG’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

FLNG's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as MARPS (33). This means that FLNG’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLNGMARPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MARPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DHLSX30.680.13
+0.43%
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
FLCGX39.770.13
+0.33%
Meeder Sector Rotation Retail
SCVEX22.830.05
+0.22%
Hartford Schroders International Stk A
NBNCX14.70-0.07
-0.47%
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
PNRCX49.47-1.15
-2.27%
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources C

FLNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLNG has been loosely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLNG jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLNG
1D Price
Change %
FLNG100%
+1.86%
FRO - FLNG
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
TRMD - FLNG
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
DHT - FLNG
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
TEN - FLNG
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
NVGS - FLNG
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
More

MARPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MARPS and WMB have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MARPS and WMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MARPS
1D Price
Change %
MARPS100%
-1.96%
WMB - MARPS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
HYTLF - MARPS
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
DTM - MARPS
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
MPLX - MARPS
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
FLNG - MARPS
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
More