Advertisement
FLNG vs MARPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLNG is a Hold and MARPS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLNG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMARPS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- FLNG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MARPS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLNG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MARPS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLNG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MARPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FLNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -1.80% price change this week, while MARPS (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -5.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLNG is expected to report earnings on Nov 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.68% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| FLNG | MARPS | FLNG / MARPS | |
| Capitalization | 1.37B | 9.12M | 15,022% |
| EBITDA | 273M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.071 | 23.303 | 103% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.22 | 12.32 | 115% |
| Revenue | 356M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 413M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.8B | N/A | - |
FLNG | MARPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLNG's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MARPS (16). This means that FLNG’s stock grew similarly to MARPS’s over the last 12 months.
FLNG's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MARPS (71). This means that FLNG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MARPS’s over the last 12 months.
MARPS's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLNG (61). This means that MARPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLNG’s over the last 12 months.
MARPS's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FLNG (47). This means that MARPS’s stock grew similarly to FLNG’s over the last 12 months.
MARPS's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as FLNG (28). This means that MARPS’s stock grew similarly to FLNG’s over the last 12 months.
| FLNG | MARPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 73% | 15 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
MARPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MARPS and BPPTU have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MARPS and BPPTU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MARPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARPS | 100% | -2.75% | ||
| BPPTU - MARPS | 21% Poorly correlated | +7.99% | ||
| CMBT - MARPS | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
| IMPP - MARPS | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.02% | ||
| FLNG - MARPS | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.12% | ||
| NGL - MARPS | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||