22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLN vs LTM
FLN vs LTM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLN vs. LTM commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLN is a Buy and LTM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LTM: Fundamental Ratings
LTM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 78 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLN | LTM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 85% | 24 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GVIP | 138.52 | 1.10 | +0.80% |
| Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | |||
| VWID | 31.97 | 0.05 | +0.15% |
| Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF | |||
| IPAC | 68.60 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
| iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | |||
| KLIP | 31.57 | -0.11 | -0.33% |
| KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strat ETF | |||
| BABO | 14.71 | -0.20 | -1.34% |
| YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
FLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLN has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLN jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLN | 100% | +0.99% | ||
| BAP - FLN | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| NU - FLN | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| OMAB - FLN | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| LTM - FLN | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.10% |
LTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LTM and AFLYY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTM and AFLYY's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| AFLYY - LTM | 17% Poorly correlated | +4.24% | ||
| LUV - LTM | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
| ULCC - LTM | 15% Poorly correlated | +3.49% | ||
| VLRS - LTM | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
| SNCY - LTM | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||