Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLN vs ILF
FLN vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLN vs ILF
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$22.41
Change-$0.25 (-1.10%)
Volume$100
Net Assets15.92M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$30.44
Change-$0.32 (-1.04%)
Volume$27.66K
Net Assets2.32B
FLN vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLN vs. ILF commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLN is a Buy and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 2.32B vs. FLN (15.9M). FLN (52.763) and ILF (50.571) have matching annual dividend yield . FLN was incepted earlier than ILF: FLN (15 years) vs ILF (24 years). ILF (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than FLN (0.80). FLN has a higher turnover ILF (18.00) vs ILF (18.00).
| FLN | ILF | FLN / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 52.763 | 50.571 | 104% |
| Net Assets | 15.9M | 2.32B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.47 | 170% |
| Turnover | 75.00 | 18.00 | 417% |
| Yield | 2.14 | 5.07 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLN | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 84% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLN has been loosely correlated with LTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLN jumps, then LTM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLN | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| LTM - FLN | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| NU - FLN | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| BAP - FLN | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| OMAB - FLN | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| PAGS - FLN | 37% Loosely correlated | -4.93% | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -1.16% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 70% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
More | ||||