Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLN vs ILF
FLN vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLN vs ILF
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$26.75
Change+$6.06 (+29.29%)
Volume$18.38K
Net Assets24.87M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$36.69
Change+$8.78 (+31.46%)
Volume$5.06M
Net Assets4.17B
FLN vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLN vs. ILF commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLN is a Buy and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 4.17B vs. FLN (24.9M). ILF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLN: ILF (20.493) vs FLN (17.943). FLN was incepted earlier than ILF: FLN (15 years) vs ILF (24 years). ILF (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than FLN (0.80). FLN has a higher turnover ILF (18.00) vs ILF (18.00).
| FLN | ILF | FLN / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 17.943 | 20.493 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 24.9M | 4.17B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.47 | 170% |
| Turnover | 75.00 | 18.00 | 417% |
| Yield | 2.98 | 3.79 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLN | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLN has been loosely correlated with NU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLN jumps, then NU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLN | 100% | +1.64% | ||
| NU - FLN | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| LTM - FLN | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| BAP - FLN | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| OMAB - FLN | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| PAGS - FLN | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +2.98% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +2.57% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 65% Loosely correlated | +5.33% | ||
More | ||||