Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLMX vs ILF
FLMX vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLMX vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF
Price$38.76
Change+$6.81 (+21.31%)
Volume$19.17K
Net Assets83.06M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$36.69
Change+$8.78 (+31.46%)
Volume$5.06M
Net Assets4.17B
FLMX vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLMX vs. ILF commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMX is a Buy and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 4.17B vs. FLMX (83.1M). ILF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLMX: ILF (20.493) vs FLMX (14.499). FLMX was incepted earlier than ILF: FLMX (8 years) vs ILF (24 years). FLMX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.47). ILF has a higher turnover FLMX (10.58) vs FLMX (10.58).
| FLMX | ILF | FLMX / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 14.499 | 20.493 | 71% |
| Net Assets | 83.1M | 4.17B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.47 | 40% |
| Turnover | 10.58 | 18.00 | 59% |
| Yield | 3.64 | 3.79 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLMX | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLMX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLMX has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLMX jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLMX | 100% | +4.39% | ||
| OMAB - FLMX | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| PAC - FLMX | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
| ACGP - FLMX | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
| Q - FLMX | -2% Poorly correlated | N/A |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +2.98% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +2.57% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 65% Loosely correlated | +5.33% | ||
More | ||||