Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLMIX vs PATRX
FLMIX vs PATRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLMIX vs. PATRX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMIX is a Hold and PATRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PATRX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. FLMIX (1.07B). PATRX pays higher dividends than FLMIX: PATRX (5.46) vs FLMIX (1.08). FLMIX was incepted earlier than PATRX: FLMIX (9 years) vs PATRX (20 years). PATRX (2.62) is less costly to investors than FLMIX (0.99). FLMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. PATRX (40.00). PATRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMIX: PATRX (0) vs FLMIX (1000000). PATRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.61 vs. FLMIX (-3.67). FLMIX return over 5 years is better than : 48.43 vs. PATRX (40.20).
| FLMIX | PATRX | FLMIX / PATRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 2.54 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 2.62 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.535 | 10.482 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 11B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 5.46 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.67 | 6.61 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.78 | 31.68 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.43 | 40.20 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement