Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLMIX vs PASCX
FLMIX vs PASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLMIX vs. PASCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMIX is a Buy and PASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PASCX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FLMIX (1.04B). PASCX pays higher dividends than FLMIX: PASCX (5.07) vs FLMIX (1.11). FLMIX was incepted earlier than PASCX: FLMIX (9 years) vs PASCX (22 years). PASCX (3.15) is less costly to investors than FLMIX (0.99). FLMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. PASCX (40.00). PASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMIX: PASCX (1000) vs FLMIX (1000000). PASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. FLMIX (-3.44). FLMIX return over 5 years is better than : 41.81 vs. PASCX (30.44).
| FLMIX | PASCX | FLMIX / PASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 3.06 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 3.15 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.299 | 7.796 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 10.9B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 5.07 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.44 | 6.96 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.36 | 12.87 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.81 | 30.44 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement