Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLMIX vs PASCX
FLMIX vs PASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLMIX vs. PASCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMIX is a Hold and PASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PASCX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. FLMIX (1.07B). PASCX pays higher dividends than FLMIX: PASCX (4.92) vs FLMIX (1.08). FLMIX was incepted earlier than PASCX: FLMIX (9 years) vs PASCX (22 years). PASCX (3.12) is less costly to investors than FLMIX (0.99). FLMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. PASCX (40.00). PASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMIX: PASCX (1000) vs FLMIX (1000000). PASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. FLMIX (-3.67). FLMIX return over 5 years is better than : 48.43 vs. PASCX (36.70).
| FLMIX | PASCX | FLMIX / PASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 3.04 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 3.12 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.535 | 10.134 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 11B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 4.92 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.67 | 6.12 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.78 | 29.83 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.43 | 36.70 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement