Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLMFX vs PASCX
FLMFX vs PASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLMFX vs. PASCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMFX is a StrongBuy and PASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PASCX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. FLMFX (1.05B). PASCX pays higher dividends than FLMFX: PASCX (4.92) vs FLMFX (0.87). FLMFX was incepted earlier than PASCX: FLMFX (37 years) vs PASCX (22 years). PASCX (3.12) is less costly to investors than FLMFX (1.20). FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. PASCX (40.00). PASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMFX: PASCX (1000) vs FLMFX (2500). PASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.78 vs. FLMFX (-2.69). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.35 vs. PASCX (33.31).
| FLMFX | PASCX | FLMFX / PASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 3.04 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 3.12 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.989 | 9.787 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 11B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 4.92 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.69 | 7.78 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.95 | 20.73 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.35 | 33.31 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.66 | 66.89 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement