Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLMFX vs PASCX
FLMFX vs PASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLMFX vs. PASCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMFX is a Buy and PASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PASCX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. FLMFX (1.04B). PASCX pays higher dividends than FLMFX: PASCX (5.07) vs FLMFX (0.89). FLMFX was incepted earlier than PASCX: FLMFX (37 years) vs PASCX (22 years). PASCX (3.15) is less costly to investors than FLMFX (1.20). FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. PASCX (40.00). PASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMFX: PASCX (1000) vs FLMFX (2500). PASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. FLMFX (-3.85). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.53 vs. PASCX (30.44).
| FLMFX | PASCX | FLMFX / PASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 3.06 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 3.15 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.111 | 7.796 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 10.9B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 5.07 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.85 | 6.96 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.22 | 12.87 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.53 | 30.44 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.35 | 57.32 | 88% |