Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLMFX vs PAANX
FLMFX vs PAANX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLMFX vs. PAANX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMFX is a Buy and PAANX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAANX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FLMFX (1.01B). PAANX pays higher dividends than FLMFX: PAANX (6.00) vs FLMFX (0.90). FLMFX was incepted earlier than PAANX: FLMFX (37 years) vs PAANX (7 years). PAANX (2.15) is less costly to investors than FLMFX (1.20). FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. PAANX (56.00). FLMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAANX: FLMFX (2500) vs PAANX (1000000). PAANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. FLMFX (-6.11). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.62 vs. PAANX (40.78).
| FLMFX | PAANX | FLMFX / PAANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 2.02 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 2.15 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.261 | 7.234 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 11.1B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 6.00 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.11 | 9.15 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.95 | 21.23 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.62 | 40.78 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement