Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLMAX vs PASCX
FLMAX vs PASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLMAX vs. PASCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMAX is a Buy and PASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PASCX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FLMAX (1.02B). PASCX pays higher dividends than FLMAX: PASCX (5.06) vs FLMAX (1.22). FLMAX was incepted earlier than PASCX: FLMAX (9 years) vs PASCX (22 years). PASCX (3.15) is less costly to investors than FLMAX (0.91). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. PASCX (40.00). PASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMAX: PASCX (1000) vs FLMAX (2500). PASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.65 vs. FLMAX (-3.97). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 46.03 vs. PASCX (30.89).
| FLMAX | PASCX | FLMAX / PASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 3.06 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 3.15 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.473 | 7.037 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 11.1B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 5.06 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.97 | 7.65 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.92 | 16.43 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.03 | 30.89 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement