Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLMAX vs PASCX
FLMAX vs PASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLMAX vs. PASCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMAX is a StrongBuy and PASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PASCX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. FLMAX (1.05B). PASCX pays higher dividends than FLMAX: PASCX (4.92) vs FLMAX (1.17). FLMAX was incepted earlier than PASCX: FLMAX (9 years) vs PASCX (22 years). PASCX (3.12) is less costly to investors than FLMAX (0.91). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. PASCX (40.00). PASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMAX: PASCX (1000) vs FLMAX (2500). PASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.78 vs. FLMAX (-2.20). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.00 vs. PASCX (33.31).
| FLMAX | PASCX | FLMAX / PASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 3.04 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 3.12 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.173 | 9.787 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 11B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 4.92 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.20 | 7.78 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.35 | 20.73 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.00 | 33.31 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement