Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLLA vs OMAB
FLLA vs OMAB Comparison
Open Charts FLLA vs OMAB
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$28.67
Change+$6.08 (+26.91%)
Volume$40K
Net Assets71.39M
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte S.A.B. de C.V. ADS
Price$120.18
Change+$17.50 (+17.04%)
Volume$125.6K
Capitalization5.8B
FLLA vs OMAB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLLA vs. OMAB commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLLA is a Buy and OMAB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMAB: Fundamental Ratings
OMAB | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLLA | OMAB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | +2.92% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
| Q - FLLA | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
OMAB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMAB has been closely correlated with PAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMAB jumps, then PAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OMAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAB | 100% | +2.19% | ||
| PAC - OMAB | 73% Closely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| ASR - OMAB | 71% Closely correlated | +4.33% | ||
| CAAP - OMAB | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASRMF - OMAB | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| GPAEF - OMAB | 20% Poorly correlated | +5.50% | ||
More | ||||