LTM | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 78 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLLA | LTM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago65% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 5 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago86% | 24 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago58% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GVIP | 138.52 | 1.10 | +0.80% |
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | |||
VWID | 31.97 | 0.05 | +0.15% |
Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF | |||
IPAC | 68.60 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | |||
KLIP | 31.57 | -0.11 | -0.33% |
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strat ETF | |||
BABO | 14.71 | -0.20 | -1.34% |
YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FLLA | 100% | +1.03% | ||
CCU - FLLA | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
OMAB - FLLA | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
AC - FLLA | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
LTM - FLLA | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.10% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LTM and AFLYY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTM and AFLYY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LTM | 100% | -0.10% | ||
AFLYY - LTM | 17% Poorly correlated | +4.24% | ||
LUV - LTM | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
ULCC - LTM | 15% Poorly correlated | +3.49% | ||
VLRS - LTM | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
SNCY - LTM | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
More |