Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLLA vs ILF
FLLA vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLLA vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$22.53
Change+$0.32 (+1.44%)
Volume$20.21K
Net Assets38.2M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$27.36
Change+$0.19 (+0.70%)
Volume$2.73M
Net Assets1.79B
FLLA vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLLA vs. ILF commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLLA is a StrongBuy and ILF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.79B vs. FLLA (38.2M). FLLA has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: FLLA (36.620) vs ILF (33.928). FLLA was incepted earlier than ILF: FLLA (7 years) vs ILF (24 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.47). ILF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| FLLA | ILF | FLLA / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 36.620 | 33.928 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 38.2M | 1.79B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.47 | 40% |
| Turnover | 14.31 | 18.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 5.18 | 5.50 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLLA | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | +1.45% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| AC - FLLA | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +0.70% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 75% Closely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +3.90% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
More | ||||