Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLLA vs ILF
FLLA vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLLA vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$22.12
Change+$0.22 (+1.00%)
Volume$27.22K
Net Assets35.18M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$26.64
Change+$0.13 (+0.49%)
Volume$1.6M
Net Assets1.75B
FLLA vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLLA vs. ILF commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLLA is a Hold and ILF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.75B vs. FLLA (35.2M). FLLA has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: FLLA (34.137) vs ILF (30.404). FLLA was incepted earlier than ILF: FLLA (7 years) vs ILF (24 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.48). FLLA has a higher turnover ILF (7.00) vs ILF (7.00).
| FLLA | ILF | FLLA / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 34.137 | 30.404 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 35.2M | 1.75B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.48 | 40% |
| Turnover | 8.97 | 7.00 | 128% |
| Yield | 5.32 | 5.69 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLLA | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 86% | 24 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
| AC - FLLA | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.10% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| NU - ILF | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
More | ||||