Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLLA vs ILF
FLLA vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLLA vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$21.77
Change-$0.09 (-0.41%)
Volume$13.69K
Net Assets32.45M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$25.88
Change-$0.12 (-0.46%)
Volume$2.44M
Net Assets1.67B
FLLA vs ILF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLLA vs. ILF commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLLA is a Hold and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.67B vs. FLLA (32.5M). FLLA has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: FLLA (28.839) vs ILF (23.769). FLLA was incepted earlier than ILF: FLLA (7 years) vs ILF (24 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.48). FLLA has a higher turnover ILF (7.00) vs ILF (7.00).
| FLLA | ILF | FLLA / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 28.839 | 23.769 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 32.5M | 1.67B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.48 | 40% |
| Turnover | 8.97 | 7.00 | 128% |
| Yield | 5.67 | 6.16 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLLA | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.18% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| AC - FLLA | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 1% Poorly correlated | -3.57% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
More | ||||