Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLLA vs ILF
FLLA vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLLA vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$20.86
Change-$0.09 (-0.43%)
Volume$11.26K
Net Assets35.49M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$25.40
Change-$0.08 (-0.31%)
Volume$1.85M
Net Assets1.68B
FLLA vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLLA vs. ILF commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLLA is a Hold and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.68B vs. FLLA (35.5M). FLLA has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: FLLA (26.524) vs ILF (24.334). FLLA was incepted earlier than ILF: FLLA (7 years) vs ILF (24 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.48). ILF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| FLLA | ILF | FLLA / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 26.524 | 24.334 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 35.5M | 1.68B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.48 | 40% |
| Turnover | 14.31 | 18.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 5.32 | 5.69 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLLA | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MGHRX | 68.70 | 0.63 | +0.93% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Growth IR | |||
| CRMAX | 10.41 | 0.07 | +0.68% |
| CRM Small/Mid Cap Value Inv | |||
| KLCCX | 11.63 | 0.07 | +0.61% |
| Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C | |||
| RAMHX | 36.99 | 0.07 | +0.19% |
| American Funds American Balanced R2E | |||
| LAIDX | 9.61 | N/A | N/A |
| Lord Abbett International Value I | |||
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
| AC - FLLA | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.60% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| NU - ILF | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||