Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLLA vs ILF
FLLA vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLLA vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$25.59
Change+$0.43 (+1.71%)
Volume$38.43K
Net Assets50.86M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$32.42
Change+$0.54 (+1.69%)
Volume$2.71M
Net Assets2.91B
FLLA vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLLA vs. ILF commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLLA is a Hold and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 2.92B vs. FLLA (50.9M). ILF (6.470) and FLLA (6.236) have matching annual dividend yield . FLLA was incepted earlier than ILF: FLLA (7 years) vs ILF (24 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.47). ILF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| FLLA | ILF | FLLA / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 6.236 | 6.470 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 50.9M | 2.92B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.47 | 40% |
| Turnover | 14.31 | 18.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 6.06 | 4.38 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLLA | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | 30 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | +1.72% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.13% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
| Q - FLLA | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +1.69% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +2.07% | ||
| NU - ILF | 66% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||