FLL
Price
$3.55
Change
-$0.05 (-1.39%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
128.2M
85 days until earnings call
PENN
Price
$18.24
Change
+$0.26 (+1.45%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.66B
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLL vs PENN

Header iconFLL vs PENN Comparison
Open Charts FLL vs PENNBanner chart's image
Full House Resorts
Price$3.55
Change-$0.05 (-1.39%)
Volume$243.54K
Capitalization128.2M
PENN Entertainment
Price$18.24
Change+$0.26 (+1.45%)
Volume$5.14M
Capitalization2.66B
FLL vs PENN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PENN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLL vs. PENN commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLL is a Hold and PENN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FLL: $3.55 vs. PENN: $18.24)
Brand notoriety: FLL and PENN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLL: 71% vs. PENN: 120%
Market capitalization -- FLL: $128.2M vs. PENN: $2.66B
FLL [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $128.2M. PENN’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $2.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $36.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePENN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PENN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLL is a better buy in the long-term than PENN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PENN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PENN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLL is a better buy in the short-term than PENN.

Price Growth

FLL (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -1.66% price change this week, while PENN (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +7.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLL is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

PENN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+0.29% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PENN($2.66B) has a higher market cap than FLL($128M). PENN YTD gains are higher at: -7.972 vs. FLL (-12.990). PENN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 840M vs. FLL (43.7M). PENN has more cash in the bank: 592M vs. FLL (30.7M). FLL has less debt than PENN: FLL (530M) vs PENN (11B). PENN has higher revenues than FLL: PENN (6.64B) vs FLL (297M).
FLLPENNFLL / PENN
Capitalization128M2.66B5%
EBITDA43.7M840M5%
Gain YTD-12.990-7.972163%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue297M6.64B4%
Total Cash30.7M592M5%
Total Debt530M11B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLL vs PENN: Fundamental Ratings
FLL
PENN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6164
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
9892
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8657
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PENN's Valuation (64) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (67). This means that PENN’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

FLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as PENN (100). This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to PENN’s over the last 12 months.

PENN's SMR Rating (92) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (98). This means that PENN’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

PENN's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (86). This means that PENN’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

FLL's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for PENN (100). This means that FLL’s stock grew significantly faster than PENN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLLPENN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PENN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNLZY1.980.14
+7.32%
DYNO NOBEL LTD.
AMNC0.12N/A
N/A
Amincor Inc
CZNL41.99N/A
N/A
Citizens National Corp.
MROPF0.13N/A
N/A
MICROPORT CARDIOFLOW MEDTECH CORP.
XROLF113.48-0.87
-0.76%
Xero Ltd.

FLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLL has been loosely correlated with GDEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLL jumps, then GDEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLL
1D Price
Change %
FLL100%
-1.39%
GDEN - FLL
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
CZR - FLL
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
INSE - FLL
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
BYD - FLL
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
PENN - FLL
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
More

PENN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PENN has been closely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PENN jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PENN
1D Price
Change %
PENN100%
+1.45%
CZR - PENN
69%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
BYD - PENN
69%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
MGM - PENN
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
INSE - PENN
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
GDEN - PENN
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
More