FLL
Price
$4.58
Change
-$0.07 (-1.51%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:17 PM (EDT)
116 days until earnings call
MGM
Price
$37.52
Change
-$0.46 (-1.21%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLL vs MGM

Header iconFLL vs MGM Comparison
Open Charts FLL vs MGMBanner chart's image
Full House Resorts
Price$4.58
Change-$0.07 (-1.51%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
MGM Resorts International
Price$37.52
Change-$0.46 (-1.21%)
Volume$3.26M
CapitalizationN/A
FLL vs MGM Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MGM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLL vs. MGM commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLL is a Hold and MGM is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (FLL: $4.65 vs. MGM: $37.52)
Brand notoriety: FLL: Not notable vs. MGM: Notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLL: 157% vs. MGM: 72%
Market capitalization -- FLL: $191.63M vs. MGM: $14.97B
FLL [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $191.63M. MGM’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $14.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGM is a better buy in the long-term than FLL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGM is a better buy in the short-term than FLL.

Price Growth

FLL (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -5.30% price change this week, while MGM (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLL is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.

MGM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-1.00% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGM($15B) has a higher market cap than FLL($192M). FLL has higher P/E ratio than MGM: FLL (43.29) vs MGM (14.98). FLL YTD gains are higher at: -13.408 vs. MGM (-16.025). MGM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.75B vs. FLL (31.3M). MGM has more cash in the bank: 2.93B vs. FLL (36.2M). FLL has less debt than MGM: FLL (515M) vs MGM (31.6B). MGM has higher revenues than FLL: MGM (16.2B) vs FLL (241M).
FLLMGMFLL / MGM
Capitalization192M15B1%
EBITDA31.3M2.75B1%
Gain YTD-13.408-16.02584%
P/E Ratio43.2914.98289%
Revenue241M16.2B1%
Total Cash36.2M2.93B1%
Total Debt515M31.6B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLL vs MGM: Fundamental Ratings
FLL
MGM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7770
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7263
SMR RATING
1..100
9540
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1267
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGM's Valuation (71) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (72). This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (72). This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's SMR Rating (40) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLL (95). This means that MGM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLL’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (72). This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

FLL's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGM (67). This means that FLL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLLMGM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MGM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

FLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLL has been loosely correlated with BALY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLL jumps, then BALY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLL
1D Price
Change %
FLL100%
-3.73%
BALY - FLL
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
GDEN - FLL
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
INSE - FLL
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
HGV - FLL
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
MGM - FLL
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
More

MGM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGM has been closely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGM jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGM
1D Price
Change %
MGM100%
-1.21%
CZR - MGM
67%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
PENN - MGM
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
PLYA - MGM
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
HGV - MGM
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
CHDN - MGM
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
More