FLL
Price
$2.72
Change
-$0.06 (-2.16%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
100.42M
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MGM
Price
$35.38
Change
-$0.16 (-0.45%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.72B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLL vs MGM

Header iconFLL vs MGM Comparison
Open Charts FLL vs MGMBanner chart's image
Full House Resorts
Price$2.72
Change-$0.06 (-2.16%)
Volume$3.6K
Capitalization100.42M
MGM Resorts International
Price$35.38
Change-$0.16 (-0.45%)
Volume$17.41K
Capitalization9.72B
FLL vs MGM Comparison Chart in %
FLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MGM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLL vs. MGM commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLL is a Hold and MGM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FLL: $2.78 vs. MGM: $35.54)
Brand notoriety: FLL: Not notable vs. MGM: Notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLL: 78% vs. MGM: 50%
Market capitalization -- FLL: $100.42M vs. MGM: $9.72B
FLL [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $100.42M. MGM’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $9.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $45.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGM is a better buy in the long-term than FLL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGM is a better buy in the short-term than FLL.

Price Growth

FLL (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +6.11% price change this week, while MGM (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +2.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLL is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.

MGM is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+0.56% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGM($9.72B) has a higher market cap than FLL($100M). MGM YTD gains are higher at: 2.569 vs. FLL (-31.863). MGM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.26B vs. FLL (41.4M). MGM has more cash in the bank: 1.96B vs. FLL (32.1M). FLL has less debt than MGM: FLL (525M) vs MGM (31.2B). MGM has higher revenues than FLL: MGM (17.2B) vs FLL (298M).
FLLMGMFLL / MGM
Capitalization100M9.72B1%
EBITDA41.4M2.26B2%
Gain YTD-31.8632.569-1,240%
P/E RatioN/A177.70-
Revenue298M17.2B2%
Total Cash32.1M1.96B2%
Total Debt525M31.2B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLL vs MGM: Fundamental Ratings
FLL
MGM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2818
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
9850
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLL's Valuation (69) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as MGM (88). This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to MGM’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLL (100). This means that MGM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLL’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's SMR Rating (50) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLL (98). This means that MGM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLL’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (63). This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (7). This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLLMGM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MGM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPXT103.570.60
+0.58%
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Technology
PSCQ29.360.06
+0.22%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (Oct) ETF
DFIP42.070.09
+0.21%
Dimensional Inflation-Protected Sec ETF
FHDG33.690.06
+0.18%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt Dyn Buffr ETF
MUU73.67-3.44
-4.46%
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares

FLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLL has been loosely correlated with GDEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLL jumps, then GDEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLL
1D Price
Change %
FLL100%
-2.80%
GDEN - FLL
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
CZR - FLL
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
INSE - FLL
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.21%
BYD - FLL
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
RRR - FLL
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
More

MGM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGM has been closely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGM jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGM
1D Price
Change %
MGM100%
+0.57%
CZR - MGM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
BYD - MGM
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
RRR - MGM
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
WYNN - MGM
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
HGV - MGM
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
More