FLL
Price
$4.10
Change
+$0.05 (+1.23%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
78 days until earnings call
MGM
Price
$34.16
Change
+$0.72 (+2.15%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
51 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLL vs MGM

Header iconFLL vs MGM Comparison
Open Charts FLL vs MGMBanner chart's image
Full House Resorts
Price$4.10
Change+$0.05 (+1.23%)
Volume$377.38K
CapitalizationN/A
MGM Resorts International
Price$34.16
Change+$0.72 (+2.15%)
Volume$8.75M
CapitalizationN/A
FLL vs MGM Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLL vs. MGM commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLL is a Hold and MGM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (FLL: $4.10 vs. MGM: $34.16)
Brand notoriety: FLL: Not notable vs. MGM: Notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLL: 228% vs. MGM: 214%
Market capitalization -- FLL: $191.63M vs. MGM: $14.97B
FLL [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $191.63M. MGM’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $14.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGM is a better buy in the long-term than FLL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MGM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGM is a better buy in the short-term than FLL.

Price Growth

FLL (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -6.82% price change this week, while MGM (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -5.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLL is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.

MGM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-1.64% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGM($15B) has a higher market cap than FLL($192M). FLL has higher P/E ratio than MGM: FLL (43.29) vs MGM (14.98). MGM (-23.545) and FLL (-23.650) have similar YTD gains . MGM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.75B vs. FLL (31.3M). MGM has more cash in the bank: 2.93B vs. FLL (36.2M). FLL has less debt than MGM: FLL (515M) vs MGM (31.6B). MGM has higher revenues than FLL: MGM (16.2B) vs FLL (241M).
FLLMGMFLL / MGM
Capitalization192M15B1%
EBITDA31.3M2.75B1%
Gain YTD-23.650-23.545100%
P/E Ratio43.2914.98289%
Revenue241M16.2B1%
Total Cash36.2M2.93B1%
Total Debt515M31.6B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLL vs MGM: Fundamental Ratings
FLL
MGM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9086
SMR RATING
1..100
9839
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
880
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGM's Valuation (69) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (73). This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (90). This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's SMR Rating (39) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLL (98). This means that MGM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLL’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (81). This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

FLL's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGM (80). This means that FLL’s stock grew significantly faster than MGM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLLMGM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

FLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLL has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLL jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLL
1D Price
Change %
FLL100%
+1.23%
INSE - FLL
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
CHDN - FLL
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
VAC - FLL
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
MGM - FLL
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
HGV - FLL
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
More

MGM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGM has been closely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGM jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGM
1D Price
Change %
MGM100%
+2.15%
CZR - MGM
67%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
PENN - MGM
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
HGV - MGM
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
PLYA - MGM
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
ACEL - MGM
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
More