FLIDY
Price
$6.07
Change
+$1.19 (+24.39%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.69B
GERS
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
777.42K
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLIDY vs GERS

Header iconFLIDY vs GERS Comparison
Open Charts FLIDY vs GERSBanner chart's image
FLSmidth & Co. A/S
Price$6.07
Change+$1.19 (+24.39%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.69B
Greenshift
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15K
Capitalization777.42K
FLIDY vs GERS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLIDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GERS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLIDY vs. GERS commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLIDY is a Buy and GERS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FLIDY: $6.07 vs. GERS: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: FLIDY and GERS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLIDY: 116% vs. GERS: 103%
Market capitalization -- FLIDY: $2.69B vs. GERS: $777.42K
FLIDY [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $2.69B. GERS’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $777.42K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLIDY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGERS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLIDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GERS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLIDY is a better buy in the long-term than GERS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLIDY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GERS’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLIDY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GERS’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GERS is a better buy in the short-term than FLIDY.

Price Growth

FLIDY (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GERS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+2.92% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLIDY($2.69B) has a higher market cap than GERS($777K). FLIDY has higher P/E ratio than GERS: FLIDY (44.25) vs GERS (0.00). FLIDY YTD gains are higher at: 27.344 vs. GERS (5.541). FLIDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.35B vs. GERS (22M). FLIDY has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. GERS (898K). GERS has less debt than FLIDY: GERS (3.94M) vs FLIDY (2.96B). FLIDY has higher revenues than GERS: FLIDY (23.2B) vs GERS (9.85M).
FLIDYGERSFLIDY / GERS
Capitalization2.69B777K346,718%
EBITDA1.35B22M6,118%
Gain YTD27.3445.541493%
P/E Ratio44.250.002,346,118%
Revenue23.2B9.85M235,533%
Total Cash1.76B898K195,657%
Total Debt2.96B3.94M75,057%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLIDY vs GERS: Fundamental Ratings
FLIDY
GERS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
67100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLIDY's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GERS (42). This means that FLIDY’s stock grew similarly to GERS’s over the last 12 months.

FLIDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GERS (100). This means that FLIDY’s stock grew significantly faster than GERS’s over the last 12 months.

FLIDY's SMR Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GERS (100). This means that FLIDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GERS’s over the last 12 months.

FLIDY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as GERS (58). This means that FLIDY’s stock grew similarly to GERS’s over the last 12 months.

FLIDY's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as GERS (100). This means that FLIDY’s stock grew similarly to GERS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLIDYGERS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
19%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
17%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLIDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GERS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIGWX28.280.33
+1.18%
Marsico Growth Institutional
LGPSX37.980.41
+1.09%
ProFunds Large Cap Growth Svc
FFXFX88.490.81
+0.92%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529-F-2
DEVLX66.510.48
+0.73%
Macquarie Small Cap Value A
RAPAX10.83-0.01
-0.09%
Cohen & Steers Real Assets A

FLIDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLIDY has been loosely correlated with ARQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLIDY jumps, then ARQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLIDY
1D Price
Change %
FLIDY100%
N/A
ARQ - FLIDY
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
SKUFF - FLIDY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEIGF - FLIDY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GERS - FLIDY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ECTXF - FLIDY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GERS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GERS and LPKFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GERS and LPKFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GERS
1D Price
Change %
GERS100%
N/A
LPKFF - GERS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLIDY - GERS
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSCR - GERS
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEAGF - GERS
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLUIF - GERS
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More