Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLHK vs MCHI
FLHK vs MCHI Comparison
Open Charts FLHK vs MCHI
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
Price$19.95
Change-$0.19 (-0.94%)
Volume$5.65K
Net Assets14.02M
iShares MSCI China ETF
Price$54.77
Change-$1.02 (-1.83%)
Volume$1.9M
Net Assets6.37B
FLHK vs MCHI Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLHK vs. MCHI commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLHK is a Hold and MCHI is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHI has more net assets: 6.37B vs. FLHK (14M). MCHI has a higher annual dividend yield than FLHK: MCHI (16.880) vs FLHK (15.135). FLHK was incepted earlier than MCHI: FLHK (8 years) vs MCHI (14 years). FLHK (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than MCHI (0.59). MCHI has a higher turnover FLHK (6.76) vs FLHK (6.76).
| FLHK | MCHI | FLHK / MCHI | |
| Gain YTD | 15.135 | 16.880 | 90% |
| Net Assets | 14M | 6.37B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.59 | 15% |
| Turnover | 6.76 | 15.00 | 45% |
| Yield | 4.00 | 2.04 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLHK | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TVC | 23.42 | N/A | N/A |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1998 Series D due June 1 2028 | |||
| DDIV | 37.14 | -0.45 | -1.20% |
| First Trust Dorsey Wright Momt & Div ETF | |||
| NJUL | 64.84 | -0.81 | -1.23% |
| Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Bfr ETF Jul | |||
| DCOR | 64.65 | -0.82 | -1.25% |
| Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | |||
| QLC | 68.35 | -0.87 | -1.26% |
| FlexShares US Quality Large Cap ETF | |||
MCHI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHI has been closely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCHI jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | 100% | -1.83% | ||
| BEKE - MCHI | 73% Closely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| BZ - MCHI | 69% Closely correlated | -3.13% | ||
| HTHT - MCHI | 67% Closely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| YUMC - MCHI | 66% Closely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| IQ - MCHI | 64% Loosely correlated | -5.46% | ||
More | ||||