Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLGB vs FSZ
FLGB vs FSZ Comparison
Open Charts FLGB vs FSZ
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
Price$35.66
Change+$3.31 (+10.23%)
Volume$1.32K
Net Assets986.85M
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$82.68
Change+$5.25 (+6.78%)
Volume$1.8K
Net Assets45.66M
FLGB vs FSZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLGB vs. FSZ commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLGB is a Buy and FSZ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLGB has more net assets: 987M vs. FSZ (45.7M). FLGB has a higher annual dividend yield than FSZ: FLGB (5.659) vs FSZ (4.645). FLGB was incepted earlier than FSZ: FLGB (8 years) vs FSZ (14 years). FLGB (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than FSZ (0.80). FSZ has a higher turnover FLGB (10.13) vs FLGB (10.13).
| FLGB | FSZ | FLGB / FSZ | |
| Gain YTD | 5.659 | 4.645 | 122% |
| Net Assets | 987M | 45.7M | 2,160% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 0.80 | 11% |
| Turnover | 10.13 | 71.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 3.33 | 1.74 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLGB | FSZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 22 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLGB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLGB has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLGB jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLGB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLGB | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| SHEL - FLGB | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| RTO - FLGB | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| EVR - FLGB | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| HLN - FLGB | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| FERG - FLGB | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
More | ||||
FSZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSZ has been loosely correlated with ALC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSZ jumps, then ALC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y