FLG
Price
$12.99
Change
+$0.13 (+1.01%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.4B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WBS
Price
$64.38
Change
+$0.76 (+1.19%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.26B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLG vs WBS

Header iconFLG vs WBS Comparison
Open Charts FLG vs WBSBanner chart's image
Flagstar Bank National Association
Price$12.99
Change+$0.13 (+1.01%)
Volume$4.86M
Capitalization5.4B
Webster Financial
Price$64.38
Change+$0.76 (+1.19%)
Volume$25.82K
Capitalization10.26B
FLG vs WBS Comparison Chart in %
FLG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLG vs. WBS commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLG is a Hold and WBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (FLG: $12.86 vs. WBS: $63.62)
Brand notoriety: FLG and WBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLG: 100% vs. WBS: 151%
Market capitalization -- FLG: $5.4B vs. WBS: $10.39B
FLG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.4B. WBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the long-term than WBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the short-term than WBS.

Price Growth

FLG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.47% price change this week, while WBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLG is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

WBS is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.83% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WBS($10.3B) has a higher market cap than FLG($5.4B). FLG YTD gains are higher at: 3.177 vs. WBS (1.080). WBS has less debt than FLG: WBS (3.81B) vs FLG (13.2B). WBS has higher revenues than FLG: WBS (2.81B) vs FLG (2.04B).
FLGWBSFLG / WBS
Capitalization5.4B10.3B52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.1771.080294%
P/E RatioN/A11.85-
Revenue2.04B2.81B73%
Total CashN/A425M-
Total Debt13.2B3.81B346%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLG vs WBS: Fundamental Ratings
FLG
WBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6176
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8246
SMR RATING
1..100
119
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4852
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9962
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLG's Valuation (14) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WBS (54). This means that FLG’s stock grew somewhat faster than WBS’s over the last 12 months.

WBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLG (82). This means that WBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

WBS's SMR Rating (9) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FLG (11). This means that WBS’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as WBS (52). This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.

WBS's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLG (99). This means that WBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLGWBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVPAX23.620.35
+1.50%
American Beacon Small Cp Val Inv
SMCFX79.550.82
+1.04%
American Funds SMALLCAP World F2
CMJIX45.690.40
+0.88%
Calvert US Mid Cap Core Rspnb Idx I
REMCX20.120.10
+0.50%
Russell Inv Emerging Markets C
SCJKX8.06N/A
N/A
Steward Covered Call Income R6

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been closely correlated with FRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then FRME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
+1.01%
FRME - FLG
67%
Closely correlated
+1.93%
VLY - FLG
66%
Closely correlated
+2.47%
BKU - FLG
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.30%
BY - FLG
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
WBS - FLG
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
More

WBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WBS has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WBS jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WBS
1D Price
Change %
WBS100%
+1.23%
FNB - WBS
93%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
WTFC - WBS
92%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
CFG - WBS
92%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
ONB - WBS
91%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
ASB - WBS
91%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
More