FLG
Price
$11.04
Change
-$0.36 (-3.16%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.56B
39 days until earnings call
TCBX
Price
$30.21
Change
-$0.69 (-2.23%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
272.41M
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLG vs TCBX

Header iconFLG vs TCBX Comparison
Open Charts FLG vs TCBXBanner chart's image
Flagstar Financial
Price$11.04
Change-$0.36 (-3.16%)
Volume$6.07M
Capitalization2.56B
Third Coast Bancshares
Price$30.21
Change-$0.69 (-2.23%)
Volume$71.03K
Capitalization272.41M
FLG vs TCBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCBX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLG vs. TCBX commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLG is a StrongBuy and TCBX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FLG: $11.04 vs. TCBX: $30.21)
Brand notoriety: FLG and TCBX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLG: 101% vs. TCBX: 115%
Market capitalization -- FLG: $2.56B vs. TCBX: $272.41M
FLG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.56B. TCBX’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $272.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTCBX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TCBX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TCBX is a better buy in the long-term than FLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCBX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TCBX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TCBX is a better buy in the short-term than FLG.

Price Growth

FLG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.12% price change this week, while TCBX (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

TCBX is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG($2.56B) has a higher market cap than TCBX($272M). TCBX has higher P/E ratio than FLG: TCBX (9.70) vs FLG (1.16). FLG YTD gains are higher at: 18.532 vs. TCBX (-11.016). TCBX has less debt than FLG: TCBX (142M) vs FLG (21.3B). FLG has higher revenues than TCBX: FLG (3.63B) vs TCBX (147M).
FLGTCBXFLG / TCBX
Capitalization2.56B272M942%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.532-11.016-168%
P/E Ratio1.169.7012%
Revenue3.63B147M2,471%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt21.3B142M15,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLG: Fundamental Ratings
FLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLGTCBX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCBX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LLYX17.660.36
+2.08%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF
UNOV35.33-0.20
-0.57%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF Nov
IFRA48.22-0.52
-1.07%
iShares US Infrastructure ETF
VFVA116.08-1.70
-1.44%
Vanguard US Value Factor ETF
CHIQ21.27-0.57
-2.61%
Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been loosely correlated with ALRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then ALRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
-3.16%
ALRS - FLG
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
FFWM - FLG
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
MBCN - FLG
33%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
MNSB - FLG
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
TCBX - FLG
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
More

TCBX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCBX has been closely correlated with BFST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TCBX jumps, then BFST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCBX
1D Price
Change %
TCBX100%
-2.23%
BFST - TCBX
73%
Closely correlated
-3.03%
EGBN - TCBX
72%
Closely correlated
-2.87%
GBCI - TCBX
72%
Closely correlated
-3.07%
EQBK - TCBX
71%
Closely correlated
-2.85%
HBNC - TCBX
71%
Closely correlated
-3.57%
More