FLG
Price
$11.17
Change
+$0.21 (+1.92%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.56B
16 days until earnings call
MBCN
Price
$31.50
Change
-$0.50 (-1.56%)
Updated
Jul 7, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
192.69M
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLG vs MBCN

Header iconFLG vs MBCN Comparison
Open Charts FLG vs MBCNBanner chart's image
Flagstar Financial
Price$11.17
Change+$0.21 (+1.92%)
Volume$4.28M
Capitalization2.56B
Middlefield Banc
Price$31.50
Change-$0.50 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization192.69M
FLG vs MBCN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLG vs. MBCN commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLG is a Hold and MBCN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FLG: $11.17 vs. MBCN: $32.00)
Brand notoriety: FLG and MBCN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLG: 67% vs. MBCN: 45%
Market capitalization -- FLG: $2.56B vs. MBCN: $192.69M
FLG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.56B. MBCN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $192.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBCN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBCN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBCN is a better buy in the long-term than FLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBCN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MBCN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBCN is a better buy in the short-term than FLG.

Price Growth

FLG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.55% price change this week, while MBCN (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

MBCN is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG($2.56B) has a higher market cap than MBCN($193M). MBCN has higher P/E ratio than FLG: MBCN (11.34) vs FLG (1.16). FLG YTD gains are higher at: 19.928 vs. MBCN (15.845). MBCN has less debt than FLG: MBCN (175M) vs FLG (21.3B). FLG has higher revenues than MBCN: FLG (3.63B) vs MBCN (71.9M).
FLGMBCNFLG / MBCN
Capitalization2.56B193M1,327%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.92815.845126%
P/E Ratio1.1611.3410%
Revenue3.63B71.9M5,053%
Total CashN/A56.2M-
Total Debt21.3B175M12,171%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLG vs MBCN: Fundamental Ratings
FLG
MBCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10042
SMR RATING
1..100
1046
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10020
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9544

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLG's Valuation (13) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBCN (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBCN’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLG (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's SMR Rating (10) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBCN (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBCN’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MBCN (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to MBCN’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLG (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew significantly faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLGMBCN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AITVF0.03N/A
N/A
Asian Television Network International, Ltd.
DCHIF0.39N/A
N/A
Digital China Holdings Ltd.
GRBMF2.72N/A
N/A
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V.
IFLXF1.01N/A
N/A
Imaflex Inc
PUPOF11.92N/A
N/A
Public Power Corporation of Greece

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been loosely correlated with ALRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then ALRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
+1.92%
ALRS - FLG
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
FFWM - FLG
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
MBCN - FLG
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
MNSB - FLG
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.81%
TCBX - FLG
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
More

MBCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBCN has been loosely correlated with AROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBCN jumps, then AROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBCN
1D Price
Change %
MBCN100%
+3.76%
AROW - MBCN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
SBCF - MBCN
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
PFIS - MBCN
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
PRK - MBCN
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
FCBC - MBCN
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
More