FLG
Price
$11.28
Change
+$0.14 (+1.26%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.69B
6 days until earnings call
FRST
Price
$9.65
Change
+$0.06 (+0.63%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
237.81M
5 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLG vs FRST

Header iconFLG vs FRST Comparison
Open Charts FLG vs FRSTBanner chart's image
Flagstar Financial
Price$11.28
Change+$0.14 (+1.26%)
Volume$4.96M
Capitalization4.69B
Primis Financial
Price$9.65
Change+$0.06 (+0.63%)
Volume$103.22K
Capitalization237.81M
FLG vs FRST Comparison Chart in %
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLG vs. FRST commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLG is a Hold and FRST is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FLG: $11.28 vs. FRST: $9.65)
Brand notoriety: FLG and FRST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLG: 97% vs. FRST: 141%
Market capitalization -- FLG: $4.69B vs. FRST: $237.81M
FLG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.69B. FRST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $237.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the long-term than FRST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FRST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRST is a better buy in the short-term than FLG.

Price Growth

FLG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.88% price change this week, while FRST (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLG is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

FRST is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG($4.69B) has a higher market cap than FRST($238M). FLG YTD gains are higher at: 21.203 vs. FRST (-14.833). FRST has less debt than FLG: FRST (124M) vs FLG (13.2B). FLG has higher revenues than FRST: FLG (2.15B) vs FRST (146M).
FLGFRSTFLG / FRST
Capitalization4.69B238M1,970%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.203-14.833-143%
P/E RatioN/A87.73-
Revenue2.15B146M1,469%
Total CashN/A7.97M-
Total Debt13.2B124M10,645%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLG vs FRST: Fundamental Ratings
FLG
FRST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7559
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8074
SMR RATING
1..100
1161
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10014
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLG's Valuation (25) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRST (95) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew significantly faster than FRST’s over the last 12 months.

FRST's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FLG (80) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FRST’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's SMR Rating (11) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRST (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRST’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FRST (63) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.

FRST's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLG (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FRST’s stock grew significantly faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLGFRST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIOYF7.980.15
+1.86%
BioSyent Inc.
SCMWY75.000.67
+0.90%
Swisscom AG
OPHLF11.81N/A
N/A
Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
FRFLF0.21N/A
N/A
FRNT Financial Inc.
MNSAF3.57-0.21
-5.56%
Mineros S.A.

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been closely correlated with VLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then VLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
+1.26%
VLY - FLG
70%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
STBA - FLG
70%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
CNOB - FLG
68%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
FRST - FLG
68%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
WSFS - FLG
68%
Closely correlated
+1.97%
More