FLFG
Price
$8.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
30.64M
LINS
Price
$29.02
Change
-$6.00 (-17.13%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLFG vs LINS

Header iconFLFG vs LINS Comparison
Open Charts FLFG vs LINSBanner chart's image
Federal Life Group
Price$8.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization30.64M
Life Insurance Co. Of Alabama
Price$29.02
Change-$6.00 (-17.13%)
Volume$7
Capitalization5.1M
FLFG vs LINS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LINS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLFG vs. LINS commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLFG is a Hold and LINS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FLFG: $8.90 vs. LINS: $29.02)
Brand notoriety: FLFG and LINS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLFG: 12% vs. LINS: 23%
Market capitalization -- FLFG: $30.64M vs. LINS: $5.1M
FLFG [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $30.64M. LINS’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $5.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $145.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $25.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLINS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LINS is a better buy in the long-term than FLFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LINS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LINS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LINS is a better buy in the short-term than FLFG.

Price Growth

FLFG (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LINS (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -17.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.81% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLFG($30.6M) has a higher market cap than LINS($5.1M). FLFG YTD gains are higher at: -1.111 vs. LINS (-63.032).
FLFGLINSFLFG / LINS
Capitalization30.6M5.1M600%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.111-63.0322%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.05MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLFG vs LINS: Fundamental Ratings
FLFG
LINS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5098
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5893
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LINS's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLFG (77). This means that LINS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLFG’s over the last 12 months.

LINS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FLFG (100). This means that LINS’s stock grew similarly to FLFG’s over the last 12 months.

LINS's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FLFG (100). This means that LINS’s stock grew similarly to FLFG’s over the last 12 months.

FLFG's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LINS (93). This means that FLFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than LINS’s over the last 12 months.

FLFG's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LINS (100). This means that FLFG’s stock grew similarly to LINS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLFGLINS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
16%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
23%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LINS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGYTF0.09N/A
N/A
Allergy Therapeutics Plc.
FRSB16.41N/A
N/A
FIRST RESOURCE BANCORP INC.
SMTOF26.80N/A
N/A
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
DRMKY19.35-0.82
-4.07%
Dormakaba Hldg AG
MAJI0.09-0.03
-24.52%
Marijuana Inc.

FLFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLFG has been loosely correlated with LINS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLFG jumps, then LINS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLFG
1D Price
Change %
FLFG100%
N/A
LINS - FLFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-17.13%
SGCFF - FLFG
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.61%
DLICY - FLFG
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
DCYHY - FLFG
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDBPF - FLFG
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LINS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LINS has been loosely correlated with FLFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LINS jumps, then FLFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LINS
1D Price
Change %
LINS100%
-17.13%
FLFG - LINS
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LINSA - LINS
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JXN - LINS
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
AFIPA - LINS
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUHYF - LINS
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More