Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLDZ vs SCHM
FLDZ vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts FLDZ vs SCHM
RiverNorth Patriot ETF
Price$29.75
Change+$0.31 (+1.05%)
Volume$400
Net Assets3.55M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$30.07
Change+$0.26 (+0.87%)
Volume$4.83K
Net Assets12.13B
FLDZ vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLDZ vs. SCHM commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLDZ is a Hold and SCHM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.1B vs. FLDZ (3.55M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than FLDZ: SCHM (8.756) vs FLDZ (5.212). FLDZ was incepted earlier than SCHM: FLDZ (4 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FLDZ (0.70). FLDZ has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| FLDZ | SCHM | FLDZ / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 5.212 | 8.756 | 60% |
| Net Assets | 3.55M | 12.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.04 | 1,750% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 13.00 | 254% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 1.41 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLDZ | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% | 6 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLDZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLDZ has been closely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLDZ jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLDZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLDZ | 100% | -0.72% | ||
| SBNY - FLDZ | 75% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CFG - FLDZ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| CZR - FLDZ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| OZK - FLDZ | 70% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| WTFC - FLDZ | 70% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.12% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.16% | ||
More | ||||