Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLDZ vs SCHM
FLDZ vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts FLDZ vs SCHM
RiverNorth Patriot ETF
Price$29.34
Change+$0.10 (+0.34%)
Volume$103
Net Assets3.52M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$29.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
Volume$934.3K
Net Assets12.07B
FLDZ vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLDZ vs. SCHM commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLDZ is a Hold and SCHM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.1B vs. FLDZ (3.52M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than FLDZ: SCHM (7.570) vs FLDZ (4.857). FLDZ was incepted earlier than SCHM: FLDZ (4 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FLDZ (0.70). FLDZ has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| FLDZ | SCHM | FLDZ / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 4.857 | 7.570 | 64% |
| Net Assets | 3.52M | 12.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.04 | 1,750% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 13.00 | 254% |
| Yield | 1.08 | 1.43 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLDZ | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLDZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLDZ has been closely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLDZ jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLDZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLDZ | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| SBNY - FLDZ | 75% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CFG - FLDZ | 71% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| CZR - FLDZ | 71% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| OZK - FLDZ | 70% Closely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| WTFC - FLDZ | 70% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
More | ||||