Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLDGX vs RGWBX
FLDGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLDGX vs RGWBX
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Retail
Price$15.04
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets493.54M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$28.19
Change-$0.20 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13B
FLDGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLDGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLDGX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. FLDGX (494M). FLDGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLDGX (0.98) vs RGWBX (0.00). FLDGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLDGX (26 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). RGWBX (1.46) and FLDGX (1.42) have similar cost to investors . RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLDGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.12 vs. FLDGX (13.76). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.74 vs. FLDGX (14.34).
| FLDGX | RGWBX | FLDGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.46 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.46 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.589 | 3.012 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 494M | 25.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.76 | 17.12 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.72 | 57.77 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.34 | 22.74 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.61 | 118.07 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers