FLD
Price
$3.68
Change
+$0.10 (+2.79%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
172.19M
67 days until earnings call
PIPR
Price
$350.86
Change
+$3.05 (+0.88%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
6.21B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLD vs PIPR

Header iconFLD vs PIPR Comparison
Open Charts FLD vs PIPRBanner chart's image
Fold Holdings
Price$3.68
Change+$0.10 (+2.79%)
Volume$504.3K
Capitalization172.19M
Piper Sandler Companies
Price$350.86
Change+$3.05 (+0.88%)
Volume$84.57K
Capitalization6.21B
FLD vs PIPR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLD vs. PIPR commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLD is a Buy and PIPR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FLD: $3.68 vs. PIPR: $350.86)
Brand notoriety: FLD and PIPR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLD: 55% vs. PIPR: 61%
Market capitalization -- FLD: $172.19M vs. PIPR: $6.21B
FLD [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $172.19M. PIPR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $6.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the long-term than FLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PIPR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the short-term than FLD.

Price Growth

FLD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -18.76% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLD is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

PIPR is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIPR($6.21B) has a higher market cap than FLD($172M). FLD has higher P/E ratio than PIPR: FLD (218.80) vs PIPR (29.56). PIPR YTD gains are higher at: 19.052 vs. FLD (-66.847). FLD has less debt than PIPR: FLD (79.9M) vs PIPR (116M). PIPR has higher revenues than FLD: PIPR (1.55B) vs FLD (5.19M).
FLDPIPRFLD / PIPR
Capitalization172M6.21B3%
EBITDA-29.75MN/A-
Gain YTD-66.84719.052-351%
P/E Ratio218.8029.56740%
Revenue5.19M1.55B0%
Total Cash6.61MN/A-
Total Debt79.9M116M69%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PIPR: Fundamental Ratings
PIPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
70
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLDPIPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
2%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALTX0.360.01
+2.83%
Altex Industries, Inc.
DCMDF1.030.03
+2.80%
Data Communications Management Corp.
RNECF12.500.12
+0.97%
Renesas Electronics Corp
NWSGY9.70N/A
N/A
CTF Services Limited
ITMPF0.97-0.03
-3.07%
ITM Power Plc

FLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLD and PWP have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLD and PWP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLD
1D Price
Change %
FLD100%
+2.79%
PWP - FLD
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
LAZ - FLD
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
PIPR - FLD
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
MC - FLD
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
JEF - FLD
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
More

PIPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIPR
1D Price
Change %
PIPR100%
+0.88%
EVR - PIPR
90%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
SF - PIPR
87%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
GS - PIPR
86%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
JEF - PIPR
84%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
LAZ - PIPR
84%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
More