FLD
Price
$3.68
Change
+$0.10 (+2.79%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
172.19M
67 days until earnings call
LAZ
Price
$53.96
Change
+$0.23 (+0.43%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.09B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLD vs LAZ

Header iconFLD vs LAZ Comparison
Open Charts FLD vs LAZBanner chart's image
Fold Holdings
Price$3.68
Change+$0.10 (+2.79%)
Volume$504.3K
Capitalization172.19M
Lazard
Price$53.96
Change+$0.23 (+0.43%)
Volume$385.54K
Capitalization5.09B
FLD vs LAZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLD vs. LAZ commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLD is a Buy and LAZ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FLD: $3.68 vs. LAZ: $53.96)
Brand notoriety: FLD and LAZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLD: 55% vs. LAZ: 44%
Market capitalization -- FLD: $172.19M vs. LAZ: $5.09B
FLD [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $172.19M. LAZ’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $5.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLAZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LAZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAZ is a better buy in the long-term than FLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LAZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLD is a better buy in the short-term than LAZ.

Price Growth

FLD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -18.76% price change this week, while LAZ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLD is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

LAZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAZ($5.09B) has a higher market cap than FLD($172M). FLD has higher P/E ratio than LAZ: FLD (218.80) vs LAZ (18.48). LAZ YTD gains are higher at: 8.183 vs. FLD (-66.847). LAZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 538M vs. FLD (-29.75M). LAZ has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. FLD (6.61M). FLD has less debt than LAZ: FLD (79.9M) vs LAZ (2.21B). LAZ has higher revenues than FLD: LAZ (3.08B) vs FLD (5.19M).
FLDLAZFLD / LAZ
Capitalization172M5.09B3%
EBITDA-29.75M538M-6%
Gain YTD-66.8478.183-817%
P/E Ratio218.8018.481,184%
Revenue5.19M3.08B0%
Total Cash6.61M1.22B1%
Total Debt79.9M2.21B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAZ: Fundamental Ratings
LAZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLDLAZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
2%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASVDX10.390.13
+1.27%
American Century Small Cap Value R6
GTILX30.750.23
+0.75%
Glenmede Disciplined USGrEqPtf InstlShrs
FCWGX74.710.31
+0.42%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc529F2
PGVFX36.530.14
+0.38%
Polaris Global Value
ARVIX13.230.04
+0.30%
ARGA International Value Institutional

FLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLD and PWP have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLD and PWP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLD
1D Price
Change %
FLD100%
+2.79%
PWP - FLD
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
LAZ - FLD
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
PIPR - FLD
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
MC - FLD
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
JEF - FLD
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
More

LAZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAZ has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAZ jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAZ
1D Price
Change %
LAZ100%
+0.43%
EVR - LAZ
87%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
MC - LAZ
85%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
SF - LAZ
84%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
HLI - LAZ
82%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
JEF - LAZ
81%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
More