FLD
Price
$3.80
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
177.8M
45 days until earnings call
GS
Price
$750.77
Change
-$7.32 (-0.97%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
227.27B
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLD vs GS

Header iconFLD vs GS Comparison
Open Charts FLD vs GSBanner chart's image
Fold Holdings
Price$3.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$157.27K
Capitalization177.8M
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$750.77
Change-$7.32 (-0.97%)
Volume$2.88M
Capitalization227.27B
FLD vs GS Comparison Chart in %
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLD vs. GS commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLD is a Hold and GS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FLD: $3.80 vs. GS: $750.77)
Brand notoriety: FLD: Not notable vs. GS: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLD: 16% vs. GS: 157%
Market capitalization -- FLD: $177.8M vs. GS: $227.27B
FLD [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $177.8M. GS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $227.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the long-term than FLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the short-term than FLD.

Price Growth

FLD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.30% price change this week, while GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +84.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLD is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

GS is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.26% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($227B) has a higher market cap than FLD($178M). FLD has higher P/E ratio than GS: FLD (218.80) vs GS (15.25). GS YTD gains are higher at: 33.127 vs. FLD (-65.766). FLD has less debt than GS: FLD (79.9M) vs GS (373B). GS has higher revenues than FLD: GS (56.2B) vs FLD (5.19M).
FLDGSFLD / GS
Capitalization178M227B0%
EBITDA-29.75MN/A-
Gain YTD-65.76633.127-199%
P/E Ratio218.8015.251,435%
Revenue5.19M56.2B0%
Total Cash6.61MN/A-
Total Debt79.9M373B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS: Fundamental Ratings
GS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
5
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLDGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAJFF28.66N/A
N/A
Canon, Inc.
MITUY12.37N/A
N/A
Mitsui Chemicals Inc.
VLMZF0.07N/A
N/A
Volcanic Gold Mines Inc.
JBPHF0.87N/A
N/A
Jacobio Pharmaceuticals Group Co Ltd.
KPTSF6.60-0.17
-2.48%
KP Tissue Inc

FLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLD and PWP have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLD and PWP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLD
1D Price
Change %
FLD100%
N/A
PWP - FLD
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
LAZ - FLD
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
MC - FLD
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
JEF - FLD
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.94%
GS - FLD
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
More

GS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
-0.97%
MS - GS
92%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
EVR - GS
88%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
SF - GS
87%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
JEF - GS
85%
Closely correlated
+5.94%
MC - GS
83%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
More