Advertisement
FLCX vs PCOFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCX is a Hold and PCOFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLCX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePCOFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FLCX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PCOFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PCOFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- PCOFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
FLCX (@Data Processing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PCOFF (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.32%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was +42.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +115.08%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Data Processing Services (-2.32% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
@Advertising/Marketing Services (+42.19% weekly)Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.
| FLCX | PCOFF | FLCX / PCOFF | |
| Capitalization | 74.5M | 442M | 17% |
| EBITDA | -755.97K | 530M | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -20.000 | 43.478 | -46% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.13 | 8.46 | 37% |
| Revenue | 49.8K | 6.85B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 0 | 2.17B | - |
| Total Debt | 3.69M | 642M | 1% |
FLCX | PCOFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PCOFF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLCX (61). This means that PCOFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLCX’s over the last 12 months.
PCOFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as FLCX (100). This means that PCOFF’s stock grew similarly to FLCX’s over the last 12 months.
PCOFF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLCX (100). This means that PCOFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLCX’s over the last 12 months.
PCOFF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLCX (69). This means that PCOFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLCX’s over the last 12 months.
PCOFF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLCX (98). This means that PCOFF’s stock grew significantly faster than FLCX’s over the last 12 months.
| FLCX | PCOFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 40% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 10% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 8% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
FLCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLCX and SGRP have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLCX and SGRP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLCX | 100% | N/A | ||
| SGRP - FLCX | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
| IH - FLCX | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FA - FLCX | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.65% | ||
| EEIQ - FLCX | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
| BLPG - FLCX | 3% Poorly correlated | +26.88% | ||
More | ||||
PCOFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PCOFF has been loosely correlated with PRSU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PCOFF jumps, then PRSU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCOFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCOFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PRSU - PCOFF | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| RBA - PCOFF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
| YUMM - PCOFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EUBG - PCOFF | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
| FLCX - PCOFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||