Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCNX vs RGEBX
FLCNX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FLCNX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
Price$35.55
Change-$1.97 (-5.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.12B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
FLCNX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCNX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCNX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FLCNX (37.1B). FLCNX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FLCNX (0.19) vs RGEBX (0.00). FLCNX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FLCNX (9 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FLCNX (0.45). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FLCNX (19.00). FLCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FLCNX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FLCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.89 vs. RGEBX (1.80). FLCNX return over 5 years is better than : 87.29 vs. RGEBX (9.88).
| FLCNX | RGEBX | FLCNX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.08 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.08 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.001 | -1.057 | -189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.1B | 336B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.89 | 1.80 | 550% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.18 | 41.63 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.29 | 9.88 | 883% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers