Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCNX vs RGEBX
FLCNX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FLCNX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
Price$36.90
Change+$0.12 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.48B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.95
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
FLCNX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCNX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCNX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FLCNX (37.5B). FLCNX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FLCNX (0.23) vs RGEBX (0.00). FLCNX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FLCNX (8 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FLCNX (0.45). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FLCNX (19.00). FLCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FLCNX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FLCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.73 vs. RGEBX (10.77). FLCNX return over 5 years is better than : 106.84 vs. RGEBX (36.57).
| FLCNX | RGEBX | FLCNX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.09 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.09 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.302 | 17.511 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.5B | 336B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.73 | 10.77 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 122.45 | 69.56 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.84 | 36.57 | 292% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement