Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCH vs KWEB
FLCH vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts FLCH vs KWEB
Franklin FTSE China ETF
Price$21.55
Change-$0.07 (-0.32%)
Volume$23.93K
Net Assets198.17M
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$33.63
Change-$0.28 (-0.83%)
Volume$9.6M
Net Assets6.28B
FLCH vs KWEB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCH vs. KWEB commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCH is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 6.28B vs. FLCH (198M). FLCH has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: FLCH (18.180) vs KWEB (15.014). FLCH was incepted earlier than KWEB: FLCH (8 years) vs KWEB (12 years). FLCH (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). KWEB has a higher turnover FLCH (9.59) vs FLCH (9.59).
| FLCH | KWEB | FLCH / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | 18.180 | 15.014 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 198M | 6.28B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.70 | 27% |
| Turnover | 9.59 | 32.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 2.80 | 3.00 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLCH | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLCH has been closely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLCH jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLCH | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| BEKE - FLCH | 72% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| BZ - FLCH | 68% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| WB - FLCH | 67% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| IQ - FLCH | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| YMM - FLCH | 64% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| BEKE - KWEB | 77% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| BZ - KWEB | 76% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| YMM - KWEB | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| IQ - KWEB | 72% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||