Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCH vs KWEB
FLCH vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts FLCH vs KWEB
Franklin FTSE China ETF
Price$24.52
Change-$0.15 (-0.61%)
Volume$100
Net Assets236.67M
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$37.12
Change-$0.48 (-1.28%)
Volume$224.41K
Net Assets9.1B
FLCH vs KWEB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCH vs. KWEB commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCH is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 9.1B vs. FLCH (237M). FLCH has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: FLCH (35.098) vs KWEB (28.574). FLCH was incepted earlier than KWEB: FLCH (8 years) vs KWEB (12 years). FLCH (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). KWEB has a higher turnover FLCH (9.30) vs FLCH (9.30).
| FLCH | KWEB | FLCH / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | 35.098 | 28.574 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 237M | 9.1B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.70 | 27% |
| Turnover | 9.30 | 54.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 2.47 | 2.74 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLCH | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 85% | 14 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLCH has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLCH jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLCH | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| JD - FLCH | 80% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| BILI - FLCH | 78% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| BIDU - FLCH | 75% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| BZ - FLCH | 68% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| HTHT - FLCH | 67% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
More | ||||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -1.04% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| KC - KWEB | 79% Closely correlated | -2.20% | ||
More | ||||