Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCGX vs RGWBX
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLCGX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Retail
Price$40.83
Change+$0.07 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.57M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$29.00
Change+$0.14 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.9B
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCGX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. FLCGX (41.6M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLCGX (0.62) vs RGWBX (0.00). FLCGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLCGX (41 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). FLCGX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. FLCGX (-2.85). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.86 vs. FLCGX (22.43).
| FLCGX | RGWBX | FLCGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.46 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.46 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.135 | 19.145 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.6M | 24.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.85 | 9.64 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.96 | 46.67 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.43 | 27.86 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.85 | 89.71 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement