Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLAX vs GMF
FLAX vs GMF Comparison
Open Charts FLAX vs GMF
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Price$28.49
Change-$0.17 (-0.59%)
Volume$5.89K
Net Assets34.03M
SPDR® S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Price$137.13
Change-$1.05 (-0.76%)
Volume$3.52K
Net Assets390.91M
FLAX vs GMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLAX vs. GMF commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLAX is a Hold and GMF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMF has more net assets: 391M vs. FLAX (34M). FLAX has a higher annual dividend yield than GMF: FLAX (26.211) vs GMF (19.511). FLAX was incepted earlier than GMF: FLAX (8 years) vs GMF (19 years). FLAX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than GMF (0.49). GMF has a higher turnover FLAX (4.50) vs FLAX (4.50).
| FLAX | GMF | FLAX / GMF | |
| Gain YTD | 26.211 | 19.511 | 134% |
| Net Assets | 34M | 391M | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.49 | 39% |
| Turnover | 4.50 | 5.00 | 90% |
| Yield | 1.90 | 1.86 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLAX | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 80% | 12 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLAX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLAX and TUYA have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLAX and TUYA's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAX | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| TUYA - FLAX | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| VIPS - FLAX | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| BEKE - FLAX | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| WB - FLAX | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| BZ - FLAX | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.13% | ||
More | ||||
GMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMF has been closely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMF jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y