FKYS
Price
$18.75
Change
-$0.49 (-2.55%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
111.32M
GVFF
Price
$6.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FKYS vs GVFF

Header iconFKYS vs GVFF Comparison
Open Charts FKYS vs GVFFBanner chart's image
First Keystone
Price$18.75
Change-$0.49 (-2.55%)
Volume$100
Capitalization111.32M
Greenville Federal Financial
Price$6.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.91K
Capitalization11.53M
FKYS vs GVFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FKYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GVFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FKYS vs. GVFF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKYS is a Hold and GVFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FKYS: $18.75 vs. GVFF: $6.50)
Brand notoriety: FKYS and GVFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FKYS: 4% vs. GVFF: 73%
Market capitalization -- FKYS: $111.32M vs. GVFF: $11.53M
FKYS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $111.32M. GVFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $11.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FKYS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGVFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FKYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GVFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FKYS is a better buy in the long-term than GVFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKYS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GVFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FKYS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GVFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FKYS is a better buy in the short-term than GVFF.

Price Growth

FKYS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +22.95% price change this week, while GVFF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKYS($111M) has a higher market cap than GVFF($11.5M). FKYS YTD gains are higher at: 44.224 vs. GVFF (-9.091). GVFF has less debt than FKYS: GVFF (24.7M) vs FKYS (210M). FKYS has higher revenues than GVFF: FKYS (40.2M) vs GVFF (5.1M).
FKYSGVFFFKYS / GVFF
Capitalization111M11.5M965%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD44.224-9.091-486%
P/E Ratio9.31N/A-
Revenue40.2M5.1M789%
Total Cash11.3MN/A-
Total Debt210M24.7M850%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FKYS vs GVFF: Fundamental Ratings
FKYS
GVFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6979
SMR RATING
1..100
9291
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3978
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3146
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GVFF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FKYS (59). This means that GVFF’s stock grew similarly to FKYS’s over the last 12 months.

FKYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as GVFF (79). This means that FKYS’s stock grew similarly to GVFF’s over the last 12 months.

GVFF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as FKYS (92). This means that GVFF’s stock grew similarly to FKYS’s over the last 12 months.

FKYS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVFF (78). This means that FKYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVFF’s over the last 12 months.

FKYS's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as GVFF (46). This means that FKYS’s stock grew similarly to GVFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKYSGVFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FKYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GVFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABIT0.060.01
+17.03%
ATHENA BITCOIN GLOBAL
ARGC2.50N/A
N/A
Arion Group Corp.
BEPTF0.86N/A
N/A
Beach Energy Ltd.
NEXPF6.09N/A
N/A
NEXI S.P.A.
AILLO67.90N/A
N/A
Ameren Illinois Company

FKYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKYS and GVFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKYS and GVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKYS
1D Price
Change %
FKYS100%
-2.55%
GVFF - FKYS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCB - FKYS
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.46%
FNRN - FKYS
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNFI - FKYS
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNBT - FKYS
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
More

GVFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GVFF and FKYS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GVFF and FKYS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GVFF
1D Price
Change %
GVFF100%
N/A
FKYS - GVFF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
JPSTF - GVFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TYCB - GVFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIEB - GVFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPHLF - GVFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More