FKWL
Price
$4.09
Change
+$0.14 (+3.54%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
35.23M
85 days until earnings call
SATS
Price
$28.80
Change
+$3.35 (+13.16%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.87B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FKWL vs SATS

Header iconFKWL vs SATS Comparison
Open Charts FKWL vs SATSBanner chart's image
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.09
Change+$0.14 (+3.54%)
Volume$30.49K
Capitalization35.23M
EchoStar
Price$28.80
Change+$3.35 (+13.16%)
Volume$9.33M
Capitalization3.87B
FKWL vs SATS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SATS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FKWL vs. SATS commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKWL is a Buy and SATS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FKWL: $4.09)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FKWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKWL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SATS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FKWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SATS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FKWL is a better buy in the short-term than SATS.

Price Growth

FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +3.54% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +4.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

FKWL is expected to report earnings on Sep 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+4.70% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SATS($3.87B) has a higher market cap than FKWL($35.2M). FKWL has higher P/E ratio than SATS: FKWL (24.15) vs SATS (11.76). SATS YTD gains are higher at: 25.786 vs. FKWL (-16.531). FKWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.17M vs. SATS (-243.4M). SATS has more cash in the bank: 2.44B vs. FKWL (32.7M). FKWL has less debt than SATS: FKWL (0) vs SATS (25.9B). SATS has higher revenues than FKWL: SATS (17B) vs FKWL (47.4M).
FKWLSATSFKWL / SATS
Capitalization35.2M3.87B1%
EBITDA-1.17M-243.4M0%
Gain YTD-16.53125.786-64%
P/E Ratio24.1511.76205%
Revenue47.4M17B0%
Total Cash32.7M2.44B1%
Total Debt025.9B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FKWL vs SATS: Fundamental Ratings
FKWL
SATS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7936
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9190
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6337
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
327
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
29n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKWL's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SATS (68) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to SATS’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SATS (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to SATS’s over the last 12 months.

SATS's SMR Rating (90) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as FKWL (91) in the null industry. This means that SATS’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

SATS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as FKWL (63) in the null industry. This means that SATS’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as SATS (27) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to SATS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKWLSATS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SATS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OPHC4.510.06
+1.35%
OptimumBank Holdings Inc
AMT217.780.26
+0.12%
American Tower Corp
RITM11.40N/A
N/A
Rithm Capital Corp
DRTS2.98-0.04
-1.16%
Alpha Tau Medical Ltd
ORLA9.57-0.45
-4.49%
Orla Mining Ltd

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and ITRN have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and ITRN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
+3.54%
ITRN - FKWL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZBRA - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
CSCO - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
ADTN - FKWL
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
SATS - FKWL
20%
Poorly correlated
+13.14%
More

SATS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SATS has been loosely correlated with SMOPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SATS jumps, then SMOPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SATS
1D Price
Change %
SATS100%
+13.14%
SMOPF - SATS
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZBRA - SATS
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
COMM - SATS
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
EXTR - SATS
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
BDC - SATS
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
More