FKWL
Price
$4.45
Change
-$0.05 (-1.11%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
52.44M
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SATS
Price
$104.39
Change
+$0.41 (+0.39%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
30.05B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FKWL vs SATS

Header iconFKWL vs SATS Comparison
Open Charts FKWL vs SATSBanner chart's image
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.45
Change-$0.05 (-1.11%)
Volume$10.29K
Capitalization52.44M
EchoStar
Price$104.39
Change+$0.41 (+0.39%)
Volume$8.97M
Capitalization30.05B
FKWL vs SATS Comparison Chart in %
FKWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SATS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FKWL vs. SATS commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKWL is a StrongBuy and SATS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (FKWL: $4.45 vs. SATS: $104.39)
Brand notoriety: FKWL and SATS are both not notable
FKWL represents the Telecommunications Equipment, while SATS is part of the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FKWL: 63% vs. SATS: 218%
Market capitalization -- FKWL: $52.44M vs. SATS: $30.05B
FKWL [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $52.44M. SATS’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $30.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $313.2B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $218.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $9.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $18.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FKWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSATS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SATS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SATS is a better buy in the long-term than FKWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKWL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SATS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FKWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SATS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SATS is a better buy in the short-term than FKWL.

Price Growth

FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -0.22% price change this week, while SATS (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +40.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +52.89%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

FKWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

SATS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+1.78% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

@Major Telecommunications (+1.11% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SATS($30.1B) has a higher market cap than FKWL($52.4M). SATS YTD gains are higher at: 354.061 vs. FKWL (-9.184). SATS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.38B vs. FKWL (-3.79M). SATS has more cash in the bank: 4.33B vs. FKWL (38.1M). FKWL has less debt than SATS: FKWL (1.48M) vs SATS (29.6B). SATS has higher revenues than FKWL: SATS (15.5B) vs FKWL (45.3M).
FKWLSATSFKWL / SATS
Capitalization52.4M30.1B0%
EBITDA-3.79M2.38B-0%
Gain YTD-9.184354.061-3%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue45.3M15.5B0%
Total Cash38.1M4.33B1%
Total Debt1.48M29.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FKWL vs SATS: Fundamental Ratings
FKWL
SATS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5033
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1006
SMR RATING
1..100
9290
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
422
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a32

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKWL's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SATS (87) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SATS’s over the last 12 months.

SATS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for FKWL (100) in the null industry. This means that SATS’s stock grew significantly faster than FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

SATS's SMR Rating (90) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as FKWL (92) in the null industry. This means that SATS’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

SATS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as FKWL (56) in the null industry. This means that SATS’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as SATS (22) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to SATS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKWLSATS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FKWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SATS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BFIX25.360.09
+0.36%
Build Bond Innovation ETF
NUHY21.670.07
+0.34%
Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bd ETF
GJUL41.150.12
+0.30%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Jul
QCJL23.710.05
+0.23%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Jul
CSQ19.330.03
+0.16%
Calamos Strategic Total Return

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and ITRN have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and ITRN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
-1.11%
ITRN - FKWL
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.49%
ZBRA - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
VSAT - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
BOXL - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
LTRX - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
+12.86%
More

SATS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SATS and LITE have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SATS and LITE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SATS
1D Price
Change %
SATS100%
+11.16%
LITE - SATS
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.57%
EXTR - SATS
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
COMM - SATS
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
GILT - SATS
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
CRDO - SATS
30%
Poorly correlated
-7.23%
More