FKWL
Price
$4.28
Change
+$0.14 (+3.38%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
50.44M
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFCO
Price
$0.38
Change
-$0.04 (-9.52%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
978.75K
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FKWL vs MFCO

Header iconFKWL vs MFCO Comparison
Open Charts FKWL vs MFCOBanner chart's image
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.28
Change+$0.14 (+3.38%)
Volume$30.19K
Capitalization50.44M
Microwave Filter
Price$0.38
Change-$0.04 (-9.52%)
Volume$17.9K
Capitalization978.75K
FKWL vs MFCO Comparison Chart in %
FKWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FKWL vs. MFCO commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKWL is a Buy and MFCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FKWL: $4.28 vs. MFCO: $0.38)
Brand notoriety: FKWL and MFCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FKWL: 231% vs. MFCO: 79%
Market capitalization -- FKWL: $50.44M vs. MFCO: $978.75K
FKWL [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $50.44M. MFCO’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $978.75K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $308.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $9.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FKWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFCO is a better buy in the long-term than FKWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKWL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFCO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FKWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MFCO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FKWL is a better buy in the short-term than MFCO.

Price Growth

FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +1.90% price change this week, while MFCO (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -9.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

FKWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+0.76% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKWL($50.4M) has a higher market cap than MFCO($979K). MFCO YTD gains are higher at: 15.152 vs. FKWL (-12.653). MFCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 196K vs. FKWL (-1.1M). MFCO has less debt than FKWL: MFCO (232K) vs FKWL (1.3M). FKWL has higher revenues than MFCO: FKWL (45.5M) vs MFCO (3.76M).
FKWLMFCOFKWL / MFCO
Capitalization50.4M979K5,148%
EBITDA-1.1M196K-559%
Gain YTD-12.65315.152-84%
P/E RatioN/A13.38-
Revenue45.5M3.76M1,209%
Total Cash38.7MN/A-
Total Debt1.3M232K558%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FKWL vs MFCO: Fundamental Ratings
FKWL
MFCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5985
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9064
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
421
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFCO's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FKWL (51). This means that MFCO’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

MFCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FKWL (100). This means that MFCO’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

MFCO's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as FKWL (90). This means that MFCO’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

MFCO's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FKWL (60). This means that MFCO’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCO (21). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to MFCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKWLMFCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FKWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BVNKF30.65N/A
N/A
Bavarian Nordic A/S
NTPIF4.01N/A
N/A
Nam Tai Property Inc.
LLEIF1.55N/A
N/A
Lleidanetworks Serveis Telematics S A
FRFFF18.60N/A
N/A
Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd.
TMXXF37.14-0.61
-1.62%
TMX Group Ltd.

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and ITRN have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and ITRN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
+3.28%
ITRN - FKWL
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
ZBRA - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
VSAT - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
BOXL - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.19%
LTRX - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
More

MFCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFCO and FKWL have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFCO and FKWL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFCO
1D Price
Change %
MFCO100%
-9.52%
FKWL - MFCO
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
KPIFF - MFCO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYSNF - MFCO
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.58%
EUTLF - MFCO
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.08%
ERIXF - MFCO
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More