FKMCF vs PLL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKMCF is a Hold and PLL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FKMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FKMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
FKMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.35% price change this week, while PLL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
PLL is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.44% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| FKMCF | PLL | FKMCF / PLL | |
| Capitalization | 5.18M | 257M | 2% |
| EBITDA | -957.41K | -18.36M | 5% |
| Gain YTD | 13.052 | 4.005 | 326% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 39.8M | - |
| Total Cash | 850K | 72.2M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 1.8K | 1.57M | 0% |
FKMCF | PLL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PLL's Valuation (33) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKMCF (85) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKMCF’s over the last 12 months.
PLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as FKMCF (100) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to FKMCF’s over the last 12 months.
FKMCF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (95) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FKMCF’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.
FKMCF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLL (84) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FKMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLL’s over the last 12 months.
FKMCF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLL (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FKMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLL’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
FKMCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FKMCF and OIIIF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKMCF and OIIIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FKMCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FKMCF | 100% | -6.17% | ||
| OIIIF - FKMCF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
| ERVFF - FKMCF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PLL - FKMCF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| BTRYF - FKMCF | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
| APAAF - FKMCF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PLL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLL | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| LAC - PLL | 53% Loosely correlated | -8.31% | ||
| SGML - PLL | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.91% | ||
| VALE - PLL | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| MP - PLL | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| MTRN - PLL | 43% Loosely correlated | +3.03% | ||
More | ||||